The Right of Reflection and Comparison in Mortgage Loan Agreements according to Directive 2014/17/UE and Its Recent Implementation in Spanish Legislation

Esther Hernández Sainz
{"title":"The Right of Reflection and Comparison in Mortgage Loan Agreements according to Directive 2014/17/UE and Its Recent Implementation in Spanish Legislation","authors":"Esther Hernández Sainz","doi":"10.15678/znuek.2019.0984.0603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective : This article analyses and critically assesses the new Spanish rules regarding the consumer’s right of reflection previous to concluding a credit agreement for residential immovable property. It also looks at how it makes consumer protection more effective. Research Design & Methods : The article is based on, first, a critical analysis of the Spanish regulation and the existing literature and, second, on a comparison between the European and the Spanish regulation of this institution. Findings : Directive 2014/17/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 February 2014 on credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property obliges Member States to specify a time period of at least seven days during which the consumer will have sufficient time to compare offers, assess their implications and make an informed decision before entering into a credit agreement. Following a lengthy delay, the Directive was implemented in Spanish legislation on 15 March, through Law 5/2019 on credit agreements relating to residential immovable property. The Directive admits the right of reflection to be articulated as a period of reflection before a credit agreement is concluded, as a period of withdrawal after the conclusion of the credit agreement or a combination of the two. Spanish legislation has chosen the first option but it does not fully respect all the requirements of the Directive. Implications / Recommendations : A period of reflection prior to the conclusion of a mortgage loan agreement is an essential instrument for consumer self-protection because it allows consumers to analyse pre-contractual information in depth, to compare offers, to assess the implications of each offer, and to make an informed decision. It likewise benefits banks and other lenders because it reduces consumer claims, and even benefits the mortgage loan market itself as it increases overall competence. Adequate regulation of this right is essential to sufficiently protect borrowers. Contribution : This article analyses the deficiencies of the Spanish regulation on the right of reflection and formulates proposals for reform.","PeriodicalId":417291,"journal":{"name":"Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15678/znuek.2019.0984.0603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective : This article analyses and critically assesses the new Spanish rules regarding the consumer’s right of reflection previous to concluding a credit agreement for residential immovable property. It also looks at how it makes consumer protection more effective. Research Design & Methods : The article is based on, first, a critical analysis of the Spanish regulation and the existing literature and, second, on a comparison between the European and the Spanish regulation of this institution. Findings : Directive 2014/17/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 February 2014 on credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property obliges Member States to specify a time period of at least seven days during which the consumer will have sufficient time to compare offers, assess their implications and make an informed decision before entering into a credit agreement. Following a lengthy delay, the Directive was implemented in Spanish legislation on 15 March, through Law 5/2019 on credit agreements relating to residential immovable property. The Directive admits the right of reflection to be articulated as a period of reflection before a credit agreement is concluded, as a period of withdrawal after the conclusion of the credit agreement or a combination of the two. Spanish legislation has chosen the first option but it does not fully respect all the requirements of the Directive. Implications / Recommendations : A period of reflection prior to the conclusion of a mortgage loan agreement is an essential instrument for consumer self-protection because it allows consumers to analyse pre-contractual information in depth, to compare offers, to assess the implications of each offer, and to make an informed decision. It likewise benefits banks and other lenders because it reduces consumer claims, and even benefits the mortgage loan market itself as it increases overall competence. Adequate regulation of this right is essential to sufficiently protect borrowers. Contribution : This article analyses the deficiencies of the Spanish regulation on the right of reflection and formulates proposals for reform.
根据2014/17/UE指令的抵押贷款协议的反思和比较权及其最近在西班牙立法中的实施
目的:本文分析并批判性地评估了西班牙关于消费者在签订住宅不动产信贷协议之前的反思权的新规则。它还着眼于如何使消费者保护更有效。研究设计与方法:本文首先基于对西班牙监管和现有文献的批判性分析,其次是对欧洲和西班牙对该机构的监管进行比较。欧洲议会和理事会2014年2月4日关于与住宅不动产相关的消费者信贷协议的指令2014/17/EU要求成员国规定至少七天的时间,在此期间消费者将有足够的时间比较报价,评估其影响并在进入信贷协议之前做出明智的决定。经过长时间的拖延,该指令于3月15日通过关于住宅不动产信贷协议的第5/2019号法律在西班牙立法中实施。该指令承认,可以将反思权表述为订立信贷协议前的一段反思期、订立信贷协议后的一段退出期或两者的结合。西班牙立法选择了第一种选择,但它没有完全尊重该指令的所有要求。影响/建议:订立按揭贷款协议前的一段时间,是消费者自我保护的重要工具,因为这段时间可让消费者深入分析订立合约前的资料,比较各项优惠,评估各项优惠的影响,并作出明智的决定。它同样有利于银行和其他贷方,因为它减少了消费者的索赔,甚至有利于抵押贷款市场本身,因为它提高了整体竞争力。对这一权利进行适当监管对于充分保护借款人至关重要。贡献:本文分析了西班牙反思权规定的不足,并提出了改革建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信