Studying the Impact of eBay on Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases

K. Gupta, J. Kesan
{"title":"Studying the Impact of eBay on Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases","authors":"K. Gupta, J. Kesan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2629399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Supreme Court’s 2006 decision on eBay Inc. vs MercExchange LLC (the eBay ruling) marked a turning point in the history of patent enforcement and policy. Almost a decade after the eBay ruling, there is still confusion about the implications and impact of this decision. Such questions still remain: Has the rate of injunctions been impacted, and if so, by how much? And, which types of parties are impacted - practicing or non-practicing entities? To our knowledge, there is not a systematic empirical study that explores whether the eBay ruling impacted practicing and non-practicing patent holders differentially, by examining an exhaustive set of rulings on both preliminary and permanent injunctions and comparing the rates pre-eBay and post-eBay. Employing a comprehensive dataset of patent cases from 2000-2012, we seek to address the following issues: (1) The difference in the rate at which both preliminary and permanent injunctions were granted for cases where an injunction was requested, including the rate at which these motions were filed pre- and post- eBay; (2) Whether the rate of injunctions granted was different based on patent ownership (practicing versus non-practicing entities). In addition, any outcome of patent cases must take into account the quality of the patents asserted. Therefore, while studying whether injunctions were granted or not, we control for proxies for patent quality based on the received citations and other metrics. We find that the U.S. Supreme Court decision in eBay v. MercExchange has had a significant impact on injunctive relief in patent cases. Contrary to earlier empirical studies involving small sample datasets, our extensive analysis with a dataset involving thousands of patent cases both pre- and post- eBay shows that the eBay decision has reduced, rather dramatically, both the level at which injunctive relief is sought in patent cases and the rate at which they are granted, particularly for preliminary injunctions. We also study the impact of the eBay decision on the quality of patents for which injunctive relief is ought and the nature of the patent plaintiff (operating company vs. non-operating company) and their relative success rates with obtaining injunctive relief. This study raises important policy questions about the current diminished role for injunctive relief in patent cases and also the relationship between injunctions and the type of patent-plaintiff entity and patent quality.","PeriodicalId":136014,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Technology eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Technology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2629399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The Supreme Court’s 2006 decision on eBay Inc. vs MercExchange LLC (the eBay ruling) marked a turning point in the history of patent enforcement and policy. Almost a decade after the eBay ruling, there is still confusion about the implications and impact of this decision. Such questions still remain: Has the rate of injunctions been impacted, and if so, by how much? And, which types of parties are impacted - practicing or non-practicing entities? To our knowledge, there is not a systematic empirical study that explores whether the eBay ruling impacted practicing and non-practicing patent holders differentially, by examining an exhaustive set of rulings on both preliminary and permanent injunctions and comparing the rates pre-eBay and post-eBay. Employing a comprehensive dataset of patent cases from 2000-2012, we seek to address the following issues: (1) The difference in the rate at which both preliminary and permanent injunctions were granted for cases where an injunction was requested, including the rate at which these motions were filed pre- and post- eBay; (2) Whether the rate of injunctions granted was different based on patent ownership (practicing versus non-practicing entities). In addition, any outcome of patent cases must take into account the quality of the patents asserted. Therefore, while studying whether injunctions were granted or not, we control for proxies for patent quality based on the received citations and other metrics. We find that the U.S. Supreme Court decision in eBay v. MercExchange has had a significant impact on injunctive relief in patent cases. Contrary to earlier empirical studies involving small sample datasets, our extensive analysis with a dataset involving thousands of patent cases both pre- and post- eBay shows that the eBay decision has reduced, rather dramatically, both the level at which injunctive relief is sought in patent cases and the rate at which they are granted, particularly for preliminary injunctions. We also study the impact of the eBay decision on the quality of patents for which injunctive relief is ought and the nature of the patent plaintiff (operating company vs. non-operating company) and their relative success rates with obtaining injunctive relief. This study raises important policy questions about the current diminished role for injunctive relief in patent cases and also the relationship between injunctions and the type of patent-plaintiff entity and patent quality.
研究eBay对专利案件禁令救济的影响
2006年,美国最高法院对eBay Inc.诉MercExchange LLC案的判决(对eBay的裁决)标志着专利执法和政策历史上的一个转折点。在对eBay的裁决过去近十年后,人们仍然对这一裁决的含义和影响感到困惑。这样的问题仍然存在:禁令的数量是否受到了影响,如果受到了影响,影响有多大?哪些类型的当事人会受到影响——执业实体还是非执业实体?据我们所知,没有一个系统的实证研究,探讨是否eBay裁决影响执业和非执业专利持有人的差异,通过检查详尽的一组初步和永久禁令的裁决,并比较比率前eBay和后eBay。利用2000-2012年专利案件的综合数据集,我们试图解决以下问题:(1)在申请禁令的案件中,初步禁令和永久禁令获得批准的比率的差异,包括这些动议在eBay之前和之后提交的比率;(2)不同专利权属(执业单位与非执业单位)的禁制令授予率是否存在差异。此外,专利案件的任何结果都必须考虑所主张专利的质量。因此,在研究禁令是否被授予时,我们根据收到的引用和其他指标控制专利质量的代理。我们发现,美国最高法院在eBay诉MercExchange案中的判决对专利案件中的禁令救济产生了重大影响。与早期涉及小样本数据集的实证研究相反,我们对涉及eBay之前和之后的数千个专利案件的数据集进行了广泛的分析,结果表明,eBay的决定大大降低了专利案件中寻求禁令救济的水平和获得禁令救济的比率,尤其是初步禁令。我们还研究了eBay判决对应当获得禁令救济的专利质量的影响,专利原告的性质(经营公司与非经营公司)及其获得禁令救济的相对成功率。本研究提出了关于目前禁令救济在专利案件中作用减弱的重要政策问题,以及禁令与专利原告实体类型和专利质量之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信