Managing public fears: Cold War sorcerers

M. Sinyutin
{"title":"Managing public fears: Cold War sorcerers","authors":"M. Sinyutin","doi":"10.21638/spbu12.2019.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For citation: Sinyutin M. V. Managing public fears: Cold War sorcerers. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 2019, vol. 12, issue 1, pp. 102–108. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2019.108 10.21638/spbu12.2019.108 The danger of the Cold War is at the public agenda again. Economic crisis at the early years of the 21st century had launched the return of Cold War public attitudes. One can find through the media about the starting stage of the Second Cold War. Under capitalism, the politicized media image is replicated like any other commodity — it is important to design a new shell and the stereotyped product will be easier bought and consumed. American social thinkers, who are specialists on US military policy and the anti-war movement, Jeremy Kuzmarov and John Marciano wrote a book that echoes the growing public concern of potential danger in case if new Cold War begins. The book is not about the Cold War itself, but on the American role in it, how it was designed and had been processed by the U.S. elite. The major focus of the book pointed on the Cold War project as a domestic American product constructed for internal consumption at the market of public policy. “It is designed to deflect public attention from our domestic ills by scapegoating a foreign nation” (171). Historically the Cold War project was rooted at the times of a Big Deal, and unprecedented success of American labor, left and social democracy movement, that occurred during the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt. We know from the history of the Soviet Union how militarization hits the democracy under a socialist system, but an example of the United States shows further reaching outcomes. Jeremy Kuzmarov and John Marciano show through the pages of the book how “anti-Communist paranoia resulted in the spread of political repression” (167). American arms producers have aimed to maintain high military spending by means of lobbying, hired-gun think tanks professional experts and corporate media. Sociologist C. Wright Mills stressed in 1958 that American economic prosperity was underpinned by a war economy. With the high unemployment rate, political elite could only increase military expenditures, which needed to get somehow justified. This need met the corporate capitalist interest to violate the Big Deal. Internal class rival which pursued the left ideology was blamed as a provider of “external danger” falsely imputed to the state that firstly claimed itself to be socialist. Political battles in the USSR could be presented for ignorant Americans as an inevitable upshot of socialism to lack public freedoms.","PeriodicalId":135763,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2019.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For citation: Sinyutin M. V. Managing public fears: Cold War sorcerers. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 2019, vol. 12, issue 1, pp. 102–108. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2019.108 10.21638/spbu12.2019.108 The danger of the Cold War is at the public agenda again. Economic crisis at the early years of the 21st century had launched the return of Cold War public attitudes. One can find through the media about the starting stage of the Second Cold War. Under capitalism, the politicized media image is replicated like any other commodity — it is important to design a new shell and the stereotyped product will be easier bought and consumed. American social thinkers, who are specialists on US military policy and the anti-war movement, Jeremy Kuzmarov and John Marciano wrote a book that echoes the growing public concern of potential danger in case if new Cold War begins. The book is not about the Cold War itself, but on the American role in it, how it was designed and had been processed by the U.S. elite. The major focus of the book pointed on the Cold War project as a domestic American product constructed for internal consumption at the market of public policy. “It is designed to deflect public attention from our domestic ills by scapegoating a foreign nation” (171). Historically the Cold War project was rooted at the times of a Big Deal, and unprecedented success of American labor, left and social democracy movement, that occurred during the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt. We know from the history of the Soviet Union how militarization hits the democracy under a socialist system, but an example of the United States shows further reaching outcomes. Jeremy Kuzmarov and John Marciano show through the pages of the book how “anti-Communist paranoia resulted in the spread of political repression” (167). American arms producers have aimed to maintain high military spending by means of lobbying, hired-gun think tanks professional experts and corporate media. Sociologist C. Wright Mills stressed in 1958 that American economic prosperity was underpinned by a war economy. With the high unemployment rate, political elite could only increase military expenditures, which needed to get somehow justified. This need met the corporate capitalist interest to violate the Big Deal. Internal class rival which pursued the left ideology was blamed as a provider of “external danger” falsely imputed to the state that firstly claimed itself to be socialist. Political battles in the USSR could be presented for ignorant Americans as an inevitable upshot of socialism to lack public freedoms.
管理公众恐惧:冷战巫师
引用本文:Sinyutin m.v.管理公众恐惧:冷战巫师。圣彼得堡大学的Vestnik说。社会学,2019,第12卷,第1期,第102-108页。https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2019.108 10.21638/spbu12.2019.108冷战的危险再次出现在公共议程上。21世纪初的经济危机促使公众态度回归冷战时期。人们可以通过媒体了解到第二次冷战的开始阶段。在资本主义制度下,政治化的媒体形象像任何其他商品一样被复制——重要的是设计一个新的外壳,刻板的产品将更容易购买和消费。研究美国军事政策和反战运动的美国社会思想家杰里米·库兹马罗夫(Jeremy Kuzmarov)和约翰·马西亚诺(John Marciano)写了一本书,回应了公众对新冷战爆发的潜在危险日益增长的担忧。这本书不是关于冷战本身,而是关于美国在其中扮演的角色,以及美国精英是如何设计和处理冷战的。这本书的主要焦点是冷战计划作为美国国内产品,在公共政策市场上为国内消费而构建。“它的目的是通过把一个外国当作替罪羊来转移公众对我们国内问题的注意力”(171)。从历史上看,冷战计划植根于“大交易”时期,这是富兰克林·罗斯福总统任期内美国劳工、左翼和社会民主运动取得空前成功的时期。我们从苏联的历史中了解到,在社会主义制度下,军事化是如何打击民主主义的,但美国的例子显示出进一步的结果。杰里米·库兹马罗夫和约翰·马西亚诺在书中展示了“反共偏执如何导致政治镇压的蔓延”(167页)。美国武器生产商的目标是通过游说、雇佣枪支智库、专业专家和企业媒体来维持高军费开支。社会学家c·赖特·米尔斯(C. Wright Mills)在1958年强调,美国经济的繁荣是由战争经济支撑的。在高失业率的情况下,政治精英们只能增加军费开支,这需要某种理由。这种需要满足了公司资本家的利益,从而违背了“大交易”。追求左派意识形态的内部阶级竞争对手被指责为“外部危险”的提供者,错误地将其归咎于最初声称自己是社会主义的国家。在无知的美国人看来,苏联的政治斗争可能是社会主义缺乏公共自由的必然结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信