Teaching Normative Economics with a Classroom Experiment: An Asymmetric Public Goods Game

Stephen J. Schmidt
{"title":"Teaching Normative Economics with a Classroom Experiment: An Asymmetric Public Goods Game","authors":"Stephen J. Schmidt","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2386907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I present an asymmetric version of the familiar public goods classroom experiment, in which some players are given more tokens to invest than others, and players collectively decide whether to divide the return to the group investment asymmetrically as well. The asymmetry between players raises normative issues about fairness, rights, and equality that are not present in the symmetric game, where efficiency is the relevant normative concept. Playing the game in class requires students to confront the distributional question, and shows how issues of efficiency can become entangled with other moral issues when solving economic policy problems. The game allows instructors to incorporate theories of distributive justice into economic reasoning in the classroom, as has been widely suggested recently.","PeriodicalId":208075,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice","volume":"467 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2386907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper I present an asymmetric version of the familiar public goods classroom experiment, in which some players are given more tokens to invest than others, and players collectively decide whether to divide the return to the group investment asymmetrically as well. The asymmetry between players raises normative issues about fairness, rights, and equality that are not present in the symmetric game, where efficiency is the relevant normative concept. Playing the game in class requires students to confront the distributional question, and shows how issues of efficiency can become entangled with other moral issues when solving economic policy problems. The game allows instructors to incorporate theories of distributive justice into economic reasoning in the classroom, as has been widely suggested recently.
用课堂实验教学规范经济学:一个不对称的公共物品博弈
在本文中,我提出了一个熟悉的公共物品课堂实验的不对称版本,在这个实验中,一些参与者被给予比其他人更多的代币来投资,参与者集体决定是否也不对称地分配群体投资的回报。玩家之间的不对称引发了关于公平、权利和平等的规范性问题,这些问题在对称博弈中并不存在,在对称博弈中,效率是相关的规范性概念。在课堂上玩这个游戏要求学生面对分配问题,并说明在解决经济政策问题时,效率问题如何与其他道德问题纠缠在一起。这款游戏允许教师将分配正义的理论融入课堂上的经济推理中,就像最近被广泛建议的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信