Paleographic evidence of localization of the early Holocene cultural unity in the southwest of Western Siberia

I. Shmidt
{"title":"Paleographic evidence of localization of the early Holocene cultural unity in the southwest of Western Siberia","authors":"I. Shmidt","doi":"10.31250/2658-3828-2022-1-76-85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article the results of paleographic analysis of two daggers from the Chernoozerye II site (Sargatsky district, Omsk region) and the Pegan burial (Makushinsky district, Kurgan region) are presented. The Pegan design as it concerns to the shape and morphology, which is based on the “rhombus chains”, is an invariant of the Chernoozerye prototype. The revealed complexity of the analogy, which includes the symbolic syntax of the ornamental text, the shape and morphology of the key symbol, the order of its graphic construction, cannot be accidental, but, obviously, indicates the “kinship” of the two existing ornamental traditions in the final Paleolithic and Mesolithic in the territory between the Middle Irtysh and the Trans-Urals. The evidence of the cultural contacts between these areas can be supported not only by similarity of stone industries, but by the stylistics of ornamental compositions on bone items. The above arguments make it possible to put forward a hypothesis on the possibility of localizing the zone of the ornamentally stable motif. The territorial proximity of the analyzed items inspires confidence in the prospects for solving the problem, but the chronological gap in their dating requires explanations concerning principles of translation of ornamental traditions and reasons of their “conservation”. The conclusions made in the study are preliminary. To support them, further researches based on new data obtained as a result of archaeological excavations and analyses of museum collections are needed.","PeriodicalId":202037,"journal":{"name":"Camera Praehistorica","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Camera Praehistorica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31250/2658-3828-2022-1-76-85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article the results of paleographic analysis of two daggers from the Chernoozerye II site (Sargatsky district, Omsk region) and the Pegan burial (Makushinsky district, Kurgan region) are presented. The Pegan design as it concerns to the shape and morphology, which is based on the “rhombus chains”, is an invariant of the Chernoozerye prototype. The revealed complexity of the analogy, which includes the symbolic syntax of the ornamental text, the shape and morphology of the key symbol, the order of its graphic construction, cannot be accidental, but, obviously, indicates the “kinship” of the two existing ornamental traditions in the final Paleolithic and Mesolithic in the territory between the Middle Irtysh and the Trans-Urals. The evidence of the cultural contacts between these areas can be supported not only by similarity of stone industries, but by the stylistics of ornamental compositions on bone items. The above arguments make it possible to put forward a hypothesis on the possibility of localizing the zone of the ornamentally stable motif. The territorial proximity of the analyzed items inspires confidence in the prospects for solving the problem, but the chronological gap in their dating requires explanations concerning principles of translation of ornamental traditions and reasons of their “conservation”. The conclusions made in the study are preliminary. To support them, further researches based on new data obtained as a result of archaeological excavations and analyses of museum collections are needed.
西伯利亚西部西南部全新世早期文化统一定位的古地理证据
本文介绍了鄂木斯克州Chernoozerye II遗址(Sargatsky地区)和Pegan墓葬(Makushinsky地区,库尔干地区)的两把匕首的古生物学分析结果。Pegan的设计基于“菱形链”的形状和形态,是Chernoozerye原型的不变特征。这种类比所揭示的复杂性,包括装饰文本的符号句法、关键符号的形状和形态、图形结构的顺序,不可能是偶然的,而是明显地表明,在中额尔齐斯和外乌拉尔之间的地区,旧石器时代末期和中石器时代存在的两种装饰传统的“亲缘关系”。这些地区之间文化联系的证据不仅可以从石业的相似性得到支持,还可以从骨制品上装饰成分的文体学上得到支持。上述论证使我们有可能对装饰稳定母题区域局部化的可能性提出假设。所分析物品的领土接近性激发了人们对解决问题前景的信心,但它们的年代差距需要解释有关装饰传统翻译原则和“保护”原因的解释。本研究得出的结论是初步的。为了支持他们,需要基于考古发掘和博物馆藏品分析所获得的新数据进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信