O PROBLEMA DA NORMATIVIDADE NA TEORIA DO RECONHECIMENTO DE HONNETH

Odair Camati
{"title":"O PROBLEMA DA NORMATIVIDADE NA TEORIA DO RECONHECIMENTO DE HONNETH","authors":"Odair Camati","doi":"10.18226/21784612.v26.e021012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text intends to make an evaluation of the possible normative answers in Honneth’s theory of recognition. I identify three major answers in Honneth’s works: a first is teleological, a second is anthropologic ant the third is anchored in formal ethics. I want to show the insufficiency of the first two answers because they are based on contingent elements and strong dependent on particular contexts. The third answer presents more complete elements for the development of a normative theory, or also a theory of justice. Honneth’s decisive point is the search for a  balance between normative and immanent elements, with normative reconstruction as method. What I want to show is that Honneth’s criteria, namely gain of individuation and socialization, need a moral grounding that can be provided by the criterion of equality or equal respect for individual autonomy. This development is presented by Honneth himself, so I want only to identify and problematize the responses of German philosopher. The investigation developed here is directed towards thinking Honneth’s theory as critical without failing to value morality. Keywords: Normativity. Recognition. Axel Honneth.","PeriodicalId":260095,"journal":{"name":"Conjectura filosofia e educação","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conjectura filosofia e educação","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18226/21784612.v26.e021012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The text intends to make an evaluation of the possible normative answers in Honneth’s theory of recognition. I identify three major answers in Honneth’s works: a first is teleological, a second is anthropologic ant the third is anchored in formal ethics. I want to show the insufficiency of the first two answers because they are based on contingent elements and strong dependent on particular contexts. The third answer presents more complete elements for the development of a normative theory, or also a theory of justice. Honneth’s decisive point is the search for a  balance between normative and immanent elements, with normative reconstruction as method. What I want to show is that Honneth’s criteria, namely gain of individuation and socialization, need a moral grounding that can be provided by the criterion of equality or equal respect for individual autonomy. This development is presented by Honneth himself, so I want only to identify and problematize the responses of German philosopher. The investigation developed here is directed towards thinking Honneth’s theory as critical without failing to value morality. Keywords: Normativity. Recognition. Axel Honneth.
霍尼思认知理论中的规范性问题
本文试图对霍尼思的认知理论中可能的规范性答案作出评价。我在霍尼思的作品中找到了三个主要的答案:第一个是目的论,第二个是人类学,第三个是形式伦理学。我想指出前两个答案的不足之处,因为它们都是建立在偶然因素的基础上的,并且强烈依赖于特定的背景。第三个答案为规范理论或正义理论的发展提供了更完整的要素。Honneth的决定性观点是在规范和内在要素之间寻找平衡,以规范重建为方法。我想展示的是,Honneth的标准,即个性化和社会化的获得,需要一个道德基础,这个基础可以通过平等或平等尊重个人自治的标准来提供。这种发展是由霍尼特自己提出的,所以我只想识别和质疑德国哲学家的回应。在这里展开的调查是为了将霍尼斯的理论视为批判性的,而不忽视道德的价值。关键词:规范。识别。阿克塞尔Honneth。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信