What Does Economics Have to Say about Afghanistan's Future?: Western Economic Naiveté and the Afghanistan Mess

J. Dew
{"title":"What Does Economics Have to Say about Afghanistan's Future?: Western Economic Naiveté and the Afghanistan Mess","authors":"J. Dew","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2198395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using three market examples: opium, grapes, and timber; this paper illustrates mismanagement of Afghan economic affairs. These examples show an adverse effect of Western influence since the 9/11 invasion. Economic policy in Afghanistan is based on the history of capitalism, not the principles of economics. This mistake has been catastrophic. The Science of Economics has predictive power in Afghanistan if Afghan beliefs are distinguished from Western beliefs. Once Afghan attitudes are understood, Afghanistan is more easily managed. The greatest economic distinction between the West and Afghanistan is the absence of individual rights, particularly, in economic terms, property rights – in Afghanistan. A focus on self-interests of Afghans, instead of property rights and foreign spending would lead to better economic outcomes in Afghanistan.","PeriodicalId":224966,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Firm Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights (Topic)","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Firm Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2198395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using three market examples: opium, grapes, and timber; this paper illustrates mismanagement of Afghan economic affairs. These examples show an adverse effect of Western influence since the 9/11 invasion. Economic policy in Afghanistan is based on the history of capitalism, not the principles of economics. This mistake has been catastrophic. The Science of Economics has predictive power in Afghanistan if Afghan beliefs are distinguished from Western beliefs. Once Afghan attitudes are understood, Afghanistan is more easily managed. The greatest economic distinction between the West and Afghanistan is the absence of individual rights, particularly, in economic terms, property rights – in Afghanistan. A focus on self-interests of Afghans, instead of property rights and foreign spending would lead to better economic outcomes in Afghanistan.
经济学对阿富汗的未来有什么看法?西方经济的幼稚和阿富汗的混乱
以三个市场为例:鸦片、葡萄和木材;这篇文章说明了阿富汗经济事务管理不善。这些例子显示了自9/11入侵以来西方影响的负面影响。阿富汗的经济政策是基于资本主义的历史,而不是经济原理。这个错误是灾难性的。如果将阿富汗人的信念与西方的信念区分开来,经济学在阿富汗具有预测力。一旦理解了阿富汗人的态度,阿富汗就更容易管理了。西方和阿富汗之间最大的经济区别是在阿富汗没有个人权利,特别是在经济方面,没有财产权。关注阿富汗人的自身利益,而不是产权和外国支出,将会给阿富汗带来更好的经济结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书