Evaluation of photorefractive holographic imaging through turbid media

N. Barry, R. Jones, S. Hyde, J. Dainty, P. French, S. Trivedi, E. Dieguez
{"title":"Evaluation of photorefractive holographic imaging through turbid media","authors":"N. Barry, R. Jones, S. Hyde, J. Dainty, P. French, S. Trivedi, E. Dieguez","doi":"10.1109/CLEO.1997.602211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are pursuing high spatial resolution confocal imaging of reflected NIR light as a diagnostic tool. To determine the efficacy of confocal imaging for in vivo pathology, it is critical to know the maximum thickness of scattering tissue through which biological signals can be detected. This limit depends on three factors: the fraction of signal photons generated in the focal region, the attenuation of the light to and from the focal region, and the background signal generated outside the focal region. Previous measurements of this limit used signals from a mirror,l which are much stronger than those expected from biological sources. Our previous Monte Carlo simulations* found that the greatest sources of contrast in reflection confocal imaging are changes in the index of refraction. For the index mismatches found in cells (-0.05),3 using a system NA of 0.4 we estimated these changes could be detected through 2-3 optical depths (ODs) of scattering. In this work, we have measured the maximum depth in ODs at which physiologic index mismatches can be detected. A confocal reflectometer was constructed (NA = 0.8) as shown in Fig. l a with an axial resolution of 4 pm. Two types of samples were investigated: 1) background was measured from homogenous scattering samples and 2) signal plus background was measured from scattering samples containing a planar index mismatch located at variable depths. Scattering was generated by 1-pm diameter latex microspheres. Scattering coefficients were calculated using Mie theory. The background was assessed by translating optically thick samples of scattering gelatin through the focus of the objective while recording the detected signal as function of position. The measured background scans from samples with three different scattering coefficients are plotted in Fig. 2a as a function of optical depth, where OD = (pJ (Depth.) An exponential fit to the background data indicates that each is decaying at eCoD. The initial amplitude of the background signal (B,) is directly proportional to the scattering coefficient (Fig. 2b). These data suggest that the background signal is produced by photons initially scattered outside the focal volume. Confocal signals from inhomogeneous scattering samples were measured by scanning a layered phantom with known optical properties (Fig. Ib). An index mismatch of 0.05 or 0.1 between the scattering gelatin and the scattering index fluid (IF) was used as a signal source at variable OD. The appropriate background was subtracted from each measure(b)","PeriodicalId":173652,"journal":{"name":"CLEO '97., Summaries of Papers Presented at the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLEO '97., Summaries of Papers Presented at the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEO.1997.602211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We are pursuing high spatial resolution confocal imaging of reflected NIR light as a diagnostic tool. To determine the efficacy of confocal imaging for in vivo pathology, it is critical to know the maximum thickness of scattering tissue through which biological signals can be detected. This limit depends on three factors: the fraction of signal photons generated in the focal region, the attenuation of the light to and from the focal region, and the background signal generated outside the focal region. Previous measurements of this limit used signals from a mirror,l which are much stronger than those expected from biological sources. Our previous Monte Carlo simulations* found that the greatest sources of contrast in reflection confocal imaging are changes in the index of refraction. For the index mismatches found in cells (-0.05),3 using a system NA of 0.4 we estimated these changes could be detected through 2-3 optical depths (ODs) of scattering. In this work, we have measured the maximum depth in ODs at which physiologic index mismatches can be detected. A confocal reflectometer was constructed (NA = 0.8) as shown in Fig. l a with an axial resolution of 4 pm. Two types of samples were investigated: 1) background was measured from homogenous scattering samples and 2) signal plus background was measured from scattering samples containing a planar index mismatch located at variable depths. Scattering was generated by 1-pm diameter latex microspheres. Scattering coefficients were calculated using Mie theory. The background was assessed by translating optically thick samples of scattering gelatin through the focus of the objective while recording the detected signal as function of position. The measured background scans from samples with three different scattering coefficients are plotted in Fig. 2a as a function of optical depth, where OD = (pJ (Depth.) An exponential fit to the background data indicates that each is decaying at eCoD. The initial amplitude of the background signal (B,) is directly proportional to the scattering coefficient (Fig. 2b). These data suggest that the background signal is produced by photons initially scattered outside the focal volume. Confocal signals from inhomogeneous scattering samples were measured by scanning a layered phantom with known optical properties (Fig. Ib). An index mismatch of 0.05 or 0.1 between the scattering gelatin and the scattering index fluid (IF) was used as a signal source at variable OD. The appropriate background was subtracted from each measure(b)
混浊介质光折变全息成像的评价
我们正在追求反射近红外光的高空间分辨率共聚焦成像作为诊断工具。为了确定共聚焦成像对体内病理的疗效,了解散射组织的最大厚度是至关重要的,通过散射组织可以检测到生物信号。这一限制取决于三个因素:在焦点区域产生的信号光子的比例、进出焦点区域的光的衰减以及在焦点区域外产生的背景信号。先前对这一极限的测量使用了来自镜子的信号,比预期的来自生物源的信号强得多。我们之前的蒙特卡罗模拟*发现,反射共聚焦成像中最大的反差来源是折射率的变化。对于在细胞中发现的指数不匹配(-0.05),3使用系统NA为0.4,我们估计这些变化可以通过2-3光学深度(ODs)散射检测到。在这项工作中,我们测量了可以检测到生理指标不匹配的ODs的最大深度。构建共聚焦反射计(NA = 0.8),如图1a所示,轴向分辨率为4pm。研究了两种类型的样品:1)均匀散射样品的背景测量和2)分布在不同深度的含有平面指数失配的散射样品的信号加背景测量。1 pm直径的乳胶微球产生散射。利用Mie理论计算散射系数。通过将散射明胶的光学厚样品通过物镜的焦点,同时记录检测到的信号作为位置的函数,来评估背景。具有三种不同散射系数的样品的实测背景扫描图如图2a所示为光学深度的函数,其中OD = (pJ(深度)。对背景数据的指数拟合表明,每一个都在eCoD处衰减。背景信号的初始振幅(B,)与散射系数成正比(图2b)。这些数据表明,背景信号是由最初散射到焦体外部的光子产生的。通过扫描具有已知光学特性的层状体来测量来自非均匀散射样品的共聚焦信号(图Ib)。在不同的OD下,使用散射明胶和散射指数流体(IF)之间的指数差为0.05或0.1作为信号源。从每个测量中减去适当的背景(b)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信