Is Political and Intercultural Theology Real Theology, and Why Should Anyone Care?

J. Rieger
{"title":"Is Political and Intercultural Theology Real Theology, and Why Should Anyone Care?","authors":"J. Rieger","doi":"10.1558/37326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few would dispute that political and intercultural theologies are here to stay. What is disputed, however, is their place in the academy. It is frequently assumed that political and intercultural theologies are merely examples of special interests and concerns and thus optional, to be embraced by some but not by others. The terminology of contextual theology has added to the confusion, as contexts are often misunderstood as the special interests and concerns of some rather than others. This article argues that political and intercultural theologies are not optional but necessary for the academic study of theology and religion today. Rather than special interest, they promote fresh approaches to the common interest, challenging seemingly unilateral and universal approaches.","PeriodicalId":323507,"journal":{"name":"Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/37326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few would dispute that political and intercultural theologies are here to stay. What is disputed, however, is their place in the academy. It is frequently assumed that political and intercultural theologies are merely examples of special interests and concerns and thus optional, to be embraced by some but not by others. The terminology of contextual theology has added to the confusion, as contexts are often misunderstood as the special interests and concerns of some rather than others. This article argues that political and intercultural theologies are not optional but necessary for the academic study of theology and religion today. Rather than special interest, they promote fresh approaches to the common interest, challenging seemingly unilateral and universal approaches.
政治神学和跨文化神学是真正的神学吗?为什么人们应该关心?
很少有人会质疑政治和跨文化神学的存在。然而,有争议的是他们在学术界的地位。人们常常认为,政治和跨文化神学仅仅是特殊利益和关切的例子,因此是可有可无的,只被一些人接受,而不被另一些人接受。上下文神学的术语增加了混乱,因为上下文经常被误解为某些人的特殊利益和关注,而不是其他人。本文认为,政治神学和跨文化神学在今天的神学和宗教学术研究中不是可有可无的,而是必须的。它们不是为了特殊利益,而是为了共同利益提倡新的方法,挑战看似单方面和普遍的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信