Independensi dan Akuntabilitas Ombudsman Republik Indonesia dengan Instrumen Westminster Foundation for Democracy (WFD)

Ahmad Redi, M. R. Bakry
{"title":"Independensi dan Akuntabilitas Ombudsman Republik Indonesia dengan Instrumen Westminster Foundation for Democracy (WFD)","authors":"Ahmad Redi, M. R. Bakry","doi":"10.58829/lp.5.2.2018.52-66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tulisan ini membahas mengenai bagaimana independensi dan akuntabilitas Ombudsman Republik Indonesia (ORI) dalam menjalankan tugasnya terhadap potensi intervensi dari Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR). Metode yang digunakan yaitu pendekatan kualitatif, dengan teknik pengumpulan data studi kepustakaan, dan teknik analisis data melalui teknik deskriptif analitis kualitatif. Berdasarkan penilaian melalui Instrument Institutional design and governance, Actual autonomy in exercising its mandate dari Westminster Foundation For Democracy (WFD) terdapat beberapa penilaian independensi dan akuntabilitas yang rendah, yaitu pada: (1) sufficiency of financial resources for performing its functions; (2) extent of autonomy to generate its own financial revenues; (3) security and stability of budget during past three years; dan (4) stability of staff and extent of staff turn-over. Ke depan ORI harus memperbaiki beberapa skor rendah independensi dan akuntabilitas dengan relasi kelembagaannya kepada DPR.\nAbstract\nThis paper discusses the independence and accountability of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia (ORI) in carrying out their duties regarding potential intervention from the People’s Representative Council (DPR). A method is a qualitative approach, with library research data collection techniques and data analysis techniques through qualitative analytical descriptive techniques. Based on an assessment through the Instrument Institutional design and governance, Actual autonomy in exercising its mandate from the Westminster Foundation For Democracy (WFD), there are several assessments of independence and low accountability, namely on: (1) sufficiency of financial resources for performing its functions; (2) the extent of autonomy to generate its financial revenues; (3) security and stability of the budget during the past three years; and (4) stability of staff and extent of staff turn-over. In the future, ORI must improve several low scores on independence and accountability with its institutional relationship with the DPR.\nKeywords: Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia, independence, accountability, Power, Control","PeriodicalId":181611,"journal":{"name":"Lex Publica","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.5.2.2018.52-66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tulisan ini membahas mengenai bagaimana independensi dan akuntabilitas Ombudsman Republik Indonesia (ORI) dalam menjalankan tugasnya terhadap potensi intervensi dari Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR). Metode yang digunakan yaitu pendekatan kualitatif, dengan teknik pengumpulan data studi kepustakaan, dan teknik analisis data melalui teknik deskriptif analitis kualitatif. Berdasarkan penilaian melalui Instrument Institutional design and governance, Actual autonomy in exercising its mandate dari Westminster Foundation For Democracy (WFD) terdapat beberapa penilaian independensi dan akuntabilitas yang rendah, yaitu pada: (1) sufficiency of financial resources for performing its functions; (2) extent of autonomy to generate its own financial revenues; (3) security and stability of budget during past three years; dan (4) stability of staff and extent of staff turn-over. Ke depan ORI harus memperbaiki beberapa skor rendah independensi dan akuntabilitas dengan relasi kelembagaannya kepada DPR. Abstract This paper discusses the independence and accountability of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia (ORI) in carrying out their duties regarding potential intervention from the People’s Representative Council (DPR). A method is a qualitative approach, with library research data collection techniques and data analysis techniques through qualitative analytical descriptive techniques. Based on an assessment through the Instrument Institutional design and governance, Actual autonomy in exercising its mandate from the Westminster Foundation For Democracy (WFD), there are several assessments of independence and low accountability, namely on: (1) sufficiency of financial resources for performing its functions; (2) the extent of autonomy to generate its financial revenues; (3) security and stability of the budget during the past three years; and (4) stability of staff and extent of staff turn-over. In the future, ORI must improve several low scores on independence and accountability with its institutional relationship with the DPR. Keywords: Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia, independence, accountability, Power, Control
本报告介绍了印度尼西亚共和国监察员(ORI)的独立和运作情况,以及监察员在人民议会(DPR)中的干预潜力。该研究采用的方法包括公共政策研究数据挖掘技术和公共政策分析数据分析技术。从威斯敏斯特民主基金会(WFD)的制度设计和治理、行使职权的实际自主性来看,其独立和运作能力的衡量标准主要包括:(1)履行职能所需的财政资源是否充足;(2)产生自身财政收入的自主程度;(3)过去三年中预算的安全性和稳定性;以及(4)工作人员的稳定性和人员流动程度。Ke depan ORI harus memperbaiki beberapa skor rendah independensi dan akuntabilitas dengan relasi kelembagaannya kepada DPR.Abstract This paper discusses the independence and accountability of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia (ORI) in carrying out their duties regarding potential intervention from the People's Representative Council (DPR)。研究方法是一种定性方法,采用图书馆研究数据收集技术和定性分析描述性数据分析技术。根据威斯敏斯特民主基金会(WFD)通过 "机构设计与治理"、"行使职权的实际自主权 "等工具进行的评估,存在独立性和低问责制方面的几项评估,即:(1) 履行职能所需的财政资源是否充足;(2) 创造财政收入的自主权程度;(3) 过去三年中预算的安全性和稳定性;(4) 工作人员的稳定性和人员流动程度。今后,共和国监察员办公室必须改善在独立性和问责制方面的几项低分,以及与人民民主 共和国的机构关系:印度尼西亚共和国监察员 独立性 问责制 权力 控制
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信