Desire, Disgust, Democracy

Nathan Wolff
{"title":"Desire, Disgust, Democracy","authors":"Nathan Wolff","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198831693.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter argues that Henry Adams’s Democracy: An American Novel (1880) offers a complex meditation on disgust’s capacity either to squelch or to express a desire for the political. Initially, Adams evokes an atmosphere of disgust in order to cultivate in his reader a shared repulsion toward antidemocratic seductions of intimacy, friendship, and attraction. This approach reflects Adams’s advocacy for competency exams, the cornerstone of the civil service reform movement’s bureaucratic effort to take feeling out of political decision-making. By Democracy’s close, however, “disgust” looks like one of the only emotional resources available for combating an apathetic acceptance of democracy’s failings, suggesting that repulsion is desire’s near relation—not its opposite. The chapter thus challenges political philosophers, such as Martha Nussbaum, who repudiate disgust; it also revisits a related strain of literary criticism, focused on Walt Whitman, that uncritically celebrates the suppression of disgust as a necessarily democratic act.","PeriodicalId":312824,"journal":{"name":"Not Quite Hope and Other Political Emotions in the Gilded Age","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Not Quite Hope and Other Political Emotions in the Gilded Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198831693.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter argues that Henry Adams’s Democracy: An American Novel (1880) offers a complex meditation on disgust’s capacity either to squelch or to express a desire for the political. Initially, Adams evokes an atmosphere of disgust in order to cultivate in his reader a shared repulsion toward antidemocratic seductions of intimacy, friendship, and attraction. This approach reflects Adams’s advocacy for competency exams, the cornerstone of the civil service reform movement’s bureaucratic effort to take feeling out of political decision-making. By Democracy’s close, however, “disgust” looks like one of the only emotional resources available for combating an apathetic acceptance of democracy’s failings, suggesting that repulsion is desire’s near relation—not its opposite. The chapter thus challenges political philosophers, such as Martha Nussbaum, who repudiate disgust; it also revisits a related strain of literary criticism, focused on Walt Whitman, that uncritically celebrates the suppression of disgust as a necessarily democratic act.
欲望,厌恶,民主
本章认为,亨利·亚当斯的《民主:一部美国小说》(1880)对厌恶的压制或表达政治欲望的能力进行了复杂的思考。最初,亚当斯唤起了一种厌恶的气氛,以便在他的读者中培养一种对亲密、友谊和吸引力等反民主诱惑的共同厌恶。这种方法反映了亚当斯对能力考试的倡导,这是公务员制度改革运动的基石,官僚主义努力将感觉从政治决策中剔除。然而,在《民主》的结尾,“厌恶”似乎是对抗对民主失败的冷漠接受的唯一情感资源之一,这表明厌恶是欲望的近亲,而不是它的对立面。因此,这一章挑战了政治哲学家,如玛莎·努斯鲍姆(Martha Nussbaum),他们否认厌恶;它还重新审视了以沃尔特·惠特曼为中心的一种相关的文学批评流派,这种批评不加批判地将抑制厌恶视为一种必要的民主行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信