A Cognitive Approach to the Instruction of Phrasal Verbs: Rudzka-Ostyn’s Model

G. Al-Otaibi
{"title":"A Cognitive Approach to the Instruction of Phrasal Verbs: Rudzka-Ostyn’s Model","authors":"G. Al-Otaibi","doi":"10.17323/JLE.2019.8170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners find some phrasal verbs problematic because of their idiomatic and polysemous nature. They are frequently used in spoken English and textbooks suggest an arbitrary way in teaching them. Cognitive linguists proposed that the particle plays a major role in determining the meaning of such phrasal verbs. This study investigated the effectiveness of a cognitive approach (i.e., Rudzka-Ostyn’s Model) in teaching taught and new phrasal verbs including metaphorical ones. Using a list of frequent phrasal verbs, a quasi-experimental design was used in which an experimental group was required to create mind maps of the common meanings of each particle with example phrasal verbs. The control group, on the other hand, was asked to memorize the frequent senses of the most frequent phrasal verbs along with their translations. The experimental group did not outperform the control group on the post-test. This was attributed to a number of problems such as the fact that some senses given by some particles are not outlined in Rudzka-Ostyn’s Model. Further, the analytical procedure followed by students to cognitively understand phrasal verbs should be made explicit and address the interaction between the verb and the particle. Additionally, following a cognitive approach, instructors should focus more on the particles up and out since they have many senses and contribute a lot to phrasal-verb formation.","PeriodicalId":202877,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Linguistics: Cognition","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Linguistics: Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/JLE.2019.8170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners find some phrasal verbs problematic because of their idiomatic and polysemous nature. They are frequently used in spoken English and textbooks suggest an arbitrary way in teaching them. Cognitive linguists proposed that the particle plays a major role in determining the meaning of such phrasal verbs. This study investigated the effectiveness of a cognitive approach (i.e., Rudzka-Ostyn’s Model) in teaching taught and new phrasal verbs including metaphorical ones. Using a list of frequent phrasal verbs, a quasi-experimental design was used in which an experimental group was required to create mind maps of the common meanings of each particle with example phrasal verbs. The control group, on the other hand, was asked to memorize the frequent senses of the most frequent phrasal verbs along with their translations. The experimental group did not outperform the control group on the post-test. This was attributed to a number of problems such as the fact that some senses given by some particles are not outlined in Rudzka-Ostyn’s Model. Further, the analytical procedure followed by students to cognitively understand phrasal verbs should be made explicit and address the interaction between the verb and the particle. Additionally, following a cognitive approach, instructors should focus more on the particles up and out since they have many senses and contribute a lot to phrasal-verb formation.
动词短语教学的认知途径:Rudzka-Ostyn模式
作为外语的英语学习者发现一些短语动词由于其惯用语性和多义性而存在问题。这些词在英语口语中经常使用,而教科书在教授这些词时建议采用武断的方式。认知语言学家提出,小词在决定这类动词短语的意义方面起着重要作用。本研究探讨了认知方法(即Rudzka-Ostyn模型)在新旧短语动词(包括隐喻动词)教学中的有效性。使用一个频繁的短语动词列表,使用准实验设计,其中一个实验组被要求用示例短语动词创建每个粒子的共同含义的思维导图。另一方面,控制组被要求记住最常用的动词短语的常义及其翻译。在后测中,实验组的表现并不优于对照组。这是由于一些问题造成的,比如Rudzka-Ostyn的模型中没有列出某些粒子赋予的某些感觉。进一步,明确学生认知动词短语所遵循的分析程序,并指出动词和助词之间的相互作用。此外,遵循认知方法,教师应该更多地关注向上和向外的微粒,因为它们有很多感官,对短语动词的形成有很大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信