Meaningful public engagement in the context of open science: reflections from early and mid-career academics

W. Boon, J. de Haan, Carien Duisterwinkel, L. Gould, W. Janssen, K. Jongsma, Megan Milota, M. Radstake, Saskia Stevens, M. Strick, Marij Swinkels, Marc H. W. van Mil, Erik van Sebille, N. Wanders, M. Yerkes
{"title":"Meaningful public engagement in the context of open science: reflections from early and mid-career academics","authors":"W. Boon, J. de Haan, Carien Duisterwinkel, L. Gould, W. Janssen, K. Jongsma, Megan Milota, M. Radstake, Saskia Stevens, M. Strick, Marij Swinkels, Marc H. W. van Mil, Erik van Sebille, N. Wanders, M. Yerkes","doi":"10.14324/rfa.06.1.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nHow is public engagement perceived to contribute to open science? This commentary highlights common reflections on this question from interviews with 12 public engagement fellows in Utrecht University’s Open Science Programme in the Netherlands. We identify four reasons why public engagement is an essential enabler of open science. Interaction between academics and society can: (1) better align science with the needs of society; (2) secure a relationship of trust between science and society; (3) increase the quality and impact of science; and (4) support the impact of open access and FAIR data practices (data which meet principles of findability, accessibility, interoperability and reusability). To be successful and sustainable, such public engagement requires support in skills training and a form of institutionalisation in a university-wide system, but, most of all, the fellows express the importance of a formal and informal recognition and rewards system. Our findings suggest that in order to make public engagement an integral part of open science, universities should invest in institutional support, create awareness, and stimulate dialogue among staff members on how to ‘do’ good public engagement.","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research for All","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/rfa.06.1.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

How is public engagement perceived to contribute to open science? This commentary highlights common reflections on this question from interviews with 12 public engagement fellows in Utrecht University’s Open Science Programme in the Netherlands. We identify four reasons why public engagement is an essential enabler of open science. Interaction between academics and society can: (1) better align science with the needs of society; (2) secure a relationship of trust between science and society; (3) increase the quality and impact of science; and (4) support the impact of open access and FAIR data practices (data which meet principles of findability, accessibility, interoperability and reusability). To be successful and sustainable, such public engagement requires support in skills training and a form of institutionalisation in a university-wide system, but, most of all, the fellows express the importance of a formal and informal recognition and rewards system. Our findings suggest that in order to make public engagement an integral part of open science, universities should invest in institutional support, create awareness, and stimulate dialogue among staff members on how to ‘do’ good public engagement.
开放科学背景下有意义的公众参与:来自职业生涯早期和中期学者的反思
公众参与如何被视为对开放科学的贡献?这篇评论突出了对荷兰乌得勒支大学开放科学项目的12名公共参与研究员的采访中对这个问题的共同思考。我们确定了公众参与是开放科学必不可少的推动者的四个原因。学术与社会的互动可以:(1)更好地将科学与社会需求结合起来;(2)建立科学与社会的信任关系;(3)提高科学的质量和影响力;(4)支持开放获取和公平数据实践(符合可查找性、可访问性、互操作性和可重用性原则的数据)的影响。为了取得成功和可持续,这种公众参与需要在技能培训方面提供支持,并在整个大学系统中形成一种制度化的形式,但最重要的是,研究员们表达了正式和非正式的认可和奖励制度的重要性。我们的研究结果表明,为了使公众参与成为开放科学的一个组成部分,大学应该投资于机构支持,创造意识,并激发教职员工之间关于如何“做”好的公众参与的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信