Use of the MoCA Combined with the Fab for the Screening of Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients with Alcohol Use Disorders

Trouillet R, Nalpas B, Ewert V, Alarcon R, P. S., Donnadieu-Rigole H, Luquiens A, Perney P
{"title":"Use of the MoCA Combined with the Fab for the Screening of Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients with Alcohol Use Disorders","authors":"Trouillet R, Nalpas B, Ewert V, Alarcon R, P. S., Donnadieu-Rigole H, Luquiens A, Perney P","doi":"10.26420/austinjpsychiatrybehavsci.2021.1083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Cognitive dysfunction is common in patients with Alcohol Use Disorders (AUD). This impairment needs to be detected since it affects the quality of life of patients and compliance with therapeutic programs. As global cognitive and executive functions may be differently affected in AUD patients, we wondered whether, when diagnosing cognitive dysfunction, specific measurement of executive functioning could provide an incremental value that could be used in addition to global cognitive measurement. Methods: Cognitive status was evaluated at admission using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test, the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) and a battery of Neuropsychological (NP) reference tests in 134 patients with AUD hospitalized in an addictions treatment unit. Results: Seventy patients (52%) had cognitive dysfunction according to the battery of Neuropsychological (NP) tests. Among these 70 patients, 59 (84%) and 38 (54%) had abnormal MoCA and FAB test results, respectively. Concordance between the MoCA and the FAB was weak (kappa = 0.27). Analysis through logistic regression showed that the Area under Curve (AUC) obtained with the MoCA test was a better single predictor of cognitive impairment (0.85) than that obtained with the FAB (0.73). Combining the two tests produced an AUC of 0.86, a value not significantly different from that obtained with the MoCA. Conclusions: The MoCA-FAB combination did not perform better than the MoCA alone as a screening tool for cognitive dysfunction among AUD patients. This confirms that the MoCA is an efficient screening tool since it can detect frontal as well as general cognitive disorders.","PeriodicalId":200970,"journal":{"name":"Austin Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjpsychiatrybehavsci.2021.1083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive dysfunction is common in patients with Alcohol Use Disorders (AUD). This impairment needs to be detected since it affects the quality of life of patients and compliance with therapeutic programs. As global cognitive and executive functions may be differently affected in AUD patients, we wondered whether, when diagnosing cognitive dysfunction, specific measurement of executive functioning could provide an incremental value that could be used in addition to global cognitive measurement. Methods: Cognitive status was evaluated at admission using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test, the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) and a battery of Neuropsychological (NP) reference tests in 134 patients with AUD hospitalized in an addictions treatment unit. Results: Seventy patients (52%) had cognitive dysfunction according to the battery of Neuropsychological (NP) tests. Among these 70 patients, 59 (84%) and 38 (54%) had abnormal MoCA and FAB test results, respectively. Concordance between the MoCA and the FAB was weak (kappa = 0.27). Analysis through logistic regression showed that the Area under Curve (AUC) obtained with the MoCA test was a better single predictor of cognitive impairment (0.85) than that obtained with the FAB (0.73). Combining the two tests produced an AUC of 0.86, a value not significantly different from that obtained with the MoCA. Conclusions: The MoCA-FAB combination did not perform better than the MoCA alone as a screening tool for cognitive dysfunction among AUD patients. This confirms that the MoCA is an efficient screening tool since it can detect frontal as well as general cognitive disorders.
MoCA联合Fab筛查酒精使用障碍患者的认知功能障碍
目的:认知功能障碍在酒精使用障碍(AUD)患者中很常见。这种损伤需要检测,因为它会影响患者的生活质量和治疗方案的依从性。由于AUD患者的整体认知和执行功能可能受到不同的影响,我们想知道,在诊断认知功能障碍时,执行功能的具体测量是否可以提供除整体认知测量外可使用的增量价值。方法:采用蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)测试、正面评估测试(FAB)和神经心理学参考测试(NP)评估134例在成瘾治疗单元住院的AUD患者入院时的认知状态。结果:70例(52%)患者经神经心理学(NP)测试存在认知功能障碍。70例患者中MoCA、FAB检测结果异常59例(84%)、38例(54%)。MoCA与FAB的一致性较弱(kappa = 0.27)。logistic回归分析表明,MoCA测试获得的曲线下面积(AUC)比FAB测试获得的AUC(0.73)更能预测认知障碍(0.85)。结合两个测试产生的AUC为0.86,与MoCA得到的值没有显著差异。结论:作为AUD患者认知功能障碍的筛查工具,MoCA- fab联合治疗并不比MoCA单独治疗效果更好。这证实了MoCA是一种有效的筛查工具,因为它可以检测额叶和一般认知障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信