Economic Evaluation of Production Methods for Sweet Corn in a Cool Climate

A. B. Kwabiah
{"title":"Economic Evaluation of Production Methods for Sweet Corn in a Cool Climate","authors":"A. B. Kwabiah","doi":"10.1300/J068v10n02_07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The use of plastic mulch offers an economically profitable approach for producing sweet corn (Zea mays L.) in Newfoundland (Canada) because of its warming effect on the soil and air around emerging plants in late spring. Information on the combined use of plastic mulch and planting dates is needed to develop a base for future research and on-farm maximum economic yield demonstration programs. Studies were conducted from May to mid-October in 2001, 2002, and 2003 to determine the effects of mulching and planting dates on days from planting to maturity (DH), total marketable yield (TMY) and the economic value (gross returns, GR; net returns, NR; and production efficiency, PE–a measure of output/input ratio) of sweet corn. The experiment was structured as a split plot design in a randomized complete block arrangement and three replicates. The main treatment was mulching: plastic mulch (PM) and no mulch (NM), and the subplot treatments were the planting dates: 1, 15 and 29 May, abbreviated PD1, PD2, and PD3, respectively. For each mulch-planting date treatment, matured ears were hand harvested and sold over a 3 wk period. There was no year effect on the measured variables. Planting date had significant effect on DH, TMY and GR. When averaged across planting dates, the PM decreased DH by 10 d. Mulching had significant effect on all variables, except TMY. However, the high premium price obtained from early planting with PM more than offset the extra cost of using plastic mulch. The beneficial effects of PM on GR were consistent across planting dates. With PM, GR had a more favorable response at PD1 than at PD2 or PD3 but with NM, GR was higher at PD2 and similar at PD1 and PD3. The PM increased NR by > $3,000.00 (Canadian)-ha− over NM and had a PE of 5.37 compared to 4.94 for NM. The study confirmed the use of plastic mulch as a tool to reduce risk in sweet corn production and with a high potential to increase profitability in Newfoundland.","PeriodicalId":169819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vegetable Crop Production","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vegetable Crop Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J068v10n02_07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT The use of plastic mulch offers an economically profitable approach for producing sweet corn (Zea mays L.) in Newfoundland (Canada) because of its warming effect on the soil and air around emerging plants in late spring. Information on the combined use of plastic mulch and planting dates is needed to develop a base for future research and on-farm maximum economic yield demonstration programs. Studies were conducted from May to mid-October in 2001, 2002, and 2003 to determine the effects of mulching and planting dates on days from planting to maturity (DH), total marketable yield (TMY) and the economic value (gross returns, GR; net returns, NR; and production efficiency, PE–a measure of output/input ratio) of sweet corn. The experiment was structured as a split plot design in a randomized complete block arrangement and three replicates. The main treatment was mulching: plastic mulch (PM) and no mulch (NM), and the subplot treatments were the planting dates: 1, 15 and 29 May, abbreviated PD1, PD2, and PD3, respectively. For each mulch-planting date treatment, matured ears were hand harvested and sold over a 3 wk period. There was no year effect on the measured variables. Planting date had significant effect on DH, TMY and GR. When averaged across planting dates, the PM decreased DH by 10 d. Mulching had significant effect on all variables, except TMY. However, the high premium price obtained from early planting with PM more than offset the extra cost of using plastic mulch. The beneficial effects of PM on GR were consistent across planting dates. With PM, GR had a more favorable response at PD1 than at PD2 or PD3 but with NM, GR was higher at PD2 and similar at PD1 and PD3. The PM increased NR by > $3,000.00 (Canadian)-ha− over NM and had a PE of 5.37 compared to 4.94 for NM. The study confirmed the use of plastic mulch as a tool to reduce risk in sweet corn production and with a high potential to increase profitability in Newfoundland.
低温条件下甜玉米生产方法的经济评价
在加拿大纽芬兰,使用塑料覆盖是一种经济上有利可图的甜玉米生产方法,因为它在春末对发芽植株周围的土壤和空气有增温作用。需要关于塑料覆盖和种植日期组合使用的信息,以便为未来的研究和农场最大经济产量示范计划奠定基础。在2001年、2002年和2003年的5月至10月中旬进行了研究,以确定覆盖和种植日期对种植至成熟期(DH)、总市场产量(TMY)和经济价值(gross returns, GR;净收益,NR;以及甜玉米的生产效率(pe,即产出/投入比)。试验采用完全随机区组的分区设计,3个重复。主要处理为覆膜(PM)和不覆膜(NM),分块处理分别为种植日期:5月1日、15日和29日,简称PD1、PD2和PD3。对于每个覆膜日期处理,成熟的穗被手工收获并在3周内出售。测量变量没有年份效应。播种期对土壤DH、TMY和GR均有显著影响,各播种期平均后,PM使土壤DH降低10 d,覆盖对除TMY外的其他变量均有显著影响。然而,PM早期种植获得的高溢价超过了使用塑料覆盖的额外成本。PM对GR的有利作用在不同的种植日期是一致的。对于PM, GR在PD1的响应比在PD2和PD3的响应更有利,而对于NM, GR在PD2的响应更高,在PD1和PD3的响应相似。PM比NM增加了> $3,000.00(加拿大)-ha, PE为5.37,而NM为4.94。该研究证实,在纽芬兰,使用塑料覆盖作为降低甜玉米生产风险的一种工具,具有提高盈利能力的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信