„Narodil se o sto let později...“. Náprstkovo muzeum Jiřího Müllera a Bohumíra Lifky

Libor Jůn
{"title":"„Narodil se o sto let později...“. Náprstkovo muzeum Jiřího Müllera a Bohumíra Lifky","authors":"Libor Jůn","doi":"10.37520/cnm.2022.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“He was born a century later…” Náprstek Museum of Jiří Muller and Bohumír Lifka\n\nThe long-standing professional and personality clashes and differences in opinion between these two well-known museum managers, Jiří Müller and Bohumír Lifka, had a major impact on the environment in which professional, everyday and official life took place at the Náprstek Museum in Prague throughout the entire nineteen thirties and forties. In many aspects, the mutual conflict and differences in opinion between archaeologist and ethnographer Jiří Müller and librarian, heraldist and archivist Bohumír Lifka, were actually the most important factor affecting the running of the entire museum institution. What is more, this occured at a time when the Náprstek Museum, which had been under-financed for many years, was integrated as provincial property in the nineteen thirties and was searching for a new content and appearance in many regards. The discord between the more conservative and professionally reasoning Lifka and the left-leaning Müller escalated in many respects during the period of occupation, when the Náprstek Museum was nearly completely undermined by its temporary German director JUDr. Edmund von Merkl. The post-war accusation of J. Müller of collaborating with the Germans and several months of Lifka’s management of the entire Náprstek Museum, definitely ended this dispute, with Jiří Müller, who determined the running of the museum during the complicated post-war period, appearing as the victor. However, his forced departure from the Náprstek Museum and Lifka’s extensive professional activities outside the museum subsequently restricted the museum’s development until the period when indologist and africanist Erich Herold was appointed its head.","PeriodicalId":440569,"journal":{"name":"Časopis Národního muzea. Řada historická","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Časopis Národního muzea. Řada historická","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37520/cnm.2022.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“He was born a century later…” Náprstek Museum of Jiří Muller and Bohumír Lifka The long-standing professional and personality clashes and differences in opinion between these two well-known museum managers, Jiří Müller and Bohumír Lifka, had a major impact on the environment in which professional, everyday and official life took place at the Náprstek Museum in Prague throughout the entire nineteen thirties and forties. In many aspects, the mutual conflict and differences in opinion between archaeologist and ethnographer Jiří Müller and librarian, heraldist and archivist Bohumír Lifka, were actually the most important factor affecting the running of the entire museum institution. What is more, this occured at a time when the Náprstek Museum, which had been under-financed for many years, was integrated as provincial property in the nineteen thirties and was searching for a new content and appearance in many regards. The discord between the more conservative and professionally reasoning Lifka and the left-leaning Müller escalated in many respects during the period of occupation, when the Náprstek Museum was nearly completely undermined by its temporary German director JUDr. Edmund von Merkl. The post-war accusation of J. Müller of collaborating with the Germans and several months of Lifka’s management of the entire Náprstek Museum, definitely ended this dispute, with Jiří Müller, who determined the running of the museum during the complicated post-war period, appearing as the victor. However, his forced departure from the Náprstek Museum and Lifka’s extensive professional activities outside the museum subsequently restricted the museum’s development until the period when indologist and africanist Erich Herold was appointed its head.
“他出生在一个世纪之后……”Náprstek Jiří Muller和Bohumír Lifka博物馆这两位著名的博物馆经理Jiří m勒和Bohumír Lifka之间长期存在的职业和个性冲突以及意见分歧,在整个20世纪30年代和40年代对布拉格Náprstek博物馆的专业、日常和官方生活环境产生了重大影响。在许多方面,考古学家和民族学家Jiří m ller与图书管理员,纹章学家和档案学家Bohumír Lifka之间的相互冲突和意见分歧,实际上是影响整个博物馆机构运行的最重要因素。更重要的是,这发生在多年来资金不足的Náprstek博物馆在20世纪30年代被合并为省级财产,并在许多方面寻求新的内容和外观的时候。在占领期间,更为保守和专业理性的利夫卡与左倾的米勒之间的分歧在许多方面都有所升级,当时Náprstek博物馆几乎完全被其临时的德国馆长朱德尔破坏了。埃德蒙·冯·默克尔。战后对J. m勒勾结德国人的指控,以及利夫卡对整个Náprstek博物馆几个月的管理,无疑结束了这场争论,在战后复杂的时期,决定博物馆运作的Jiří m勒成为了胜利者。然而,他被迫离开Náprstek博物馆,以及利夫卡在博物馆外的广泛专业活动随后限制了博物馆的发展,直到印度学家和非洲学家埃里希·赫罗尔德被任命为博物馆馆长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信