{"title":"From Control to Adaptation: America's Toy Story","authors":"K. Jackson","doi":"10.1111/J.1537-4726.2001.2401_139.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The child's toys and the old man's reasons are the fruits of the two seasons. -William Blake Introduction Nothing defines us more than our toys. From infancy, when we clutch brightly-colored blocks and cuddly teddy bears, to adulthood, when our toys of choice are fast cars, electronic games, and cute or expensive collectibles, toys say a great deal about who we are and what we value. Some toys, such as kites, jacks, and hoops, are inherently recreational, enabling us to have fun. More often than not, though, toys also serve a larger purpose as they exemplify our cultural truths: what skills we hope to develop, what attitudes we want to cultivate, and what possessions we wish to flaunt. Toys reflect the interplay between our society's view of play and its opposite, work. All societies have had toys, affirming a basic human need to connect with an object-perhaps a doll or a ball-in some form of play. However, it was not until the late sixteenth century that the word \"toy\"-which was associated with triviality, delusion, and lust-began to refer to children's playthings (Kuznets 10). In America by end of the nineteenth century, the notion of \"toy\" took on new meaning. Prior to this time, toys-which were almost always homemade, usually of wood-were few, as children endured endless hours of chores, leaving little time for play. The toys and games that they did have frequently embodied moralistic messages. By the Industrial Age, this began to change as mass-produced, affordable toys became available, and workers had the income to buy them. At the same time, children, who previously were regarded as little adults and treated accordingly, entered a new sphere. Deemed different from adults by virtue of their innocence, children warranted special care, protection, nurturing, and instruction as they moved through a distinct stage of development known as childhood, characterized by their own books, clothing, and playthings. In essence, they won the right to be children and to play, and toys became part of the formula. This attitude became even more entrenched by the 1950s when, during the the post-World War II baby boom, television invaded American homes attracting children with shows and advertising geared to them and espousing a child-centered, family-oriented agenda. In such a culture, where children are highly valued, the role of toys takes on greater importance, and several questions emerge, some practical, others ideological. What functions do, and should, toys provide? What messages do toys and the narratives that accompany them impart to children? How do toys reflect and affect attitudes and values in a dynamic, increasingly technological, careerist, and consumerist mass culture? Do we ever outgrow our toys? As artifacts of popular culture, toys embody the controversies of their time. Sites of philosophical struggle, they form a text that invites a discussion of contemporary issues regarding empowerment, control, social roles, and consumption. Then and Now One way to address these issues is to consider how toys have changed. In the summer of 2000, the Francis Land House in Virginia Beach, Virginia, which dates back to colonial times, presented an exhibit of American toys from the first half of the twentieth century. Titled \"Memories of Childhood,\" it was made possible through the contributions of various friends and members of the Francis Land House Historic Society, who scoured their attics for treasured childhood play-- things. In one corner of the exhibition hall stood a large white doll house with painted green shutters that Henry Nichols Horton built in 1925 for his daughter Doris. An exact replica of the Horton Family home in Providence, Rhode Island, the doll house contained furniture and accessories that Horton hand crafted. Other toys in the exhibit included a Shirley Temple doll in a blue dress, a porcelain tea set painted with red flowers, a pair of rusty roller skates with a key, a clay marble game, two tattered brown teddy bears, a cowboy shirt and spurs, a 'Lil Orphan Annie stove previously used to bake mud pies, and several tin toys, such as a bus, train, and plane. …","PeriodicalId":134380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of American & Comparative Cultures","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of American & Comparative Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1537-4726.2001.2401_139.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
The child's toys and the old man's reasons are the fruits of the two seasons. -William Blake Introduction Nothing defines us more than our toys. From infancy, when we clutch brightly-colored blocks and cuddly teddy bears, to adulthood, when our toys of choice are fast cars, electronic games, and cute or expensive collectibles, toys say a great deal about who we are and what we value. Some toys, such as kites, jacks, and hoops, are inherently recreational, enabling us to have fun. More often than not, though, toys also serve a larger purpose as they exemplify our cultural truths: what skills we hope to develop, what attitudes we want to cultivate, and what possessions we wish to flaunt. Toys reflect the interplay between our society's view of play and its opposite, work. All societies have had toys, affirming a basic human need to connect with an object-perhaps a doll or a ball-in some form of play. However, it was not until the late sixteenth century that the word "toy"-which was associated with triviality, delusion, and lust-began to refer to children's playthings (Kuznets 10). In America by end of the nineteenth century, the notion of "toy" took on new meaning. Prior to this time, toys-which were almost always homemade, usually of wood-were few, as children endured endless hours of chores, leaving little time for play. The toys and games that they did have frequently embodied moralistic messages. By the Industrial Age, this began to change as mass-produced, affordable toys became available, and workers had the income to buy them. At the same time, children, who previously were regarded as little adults and treated accordingly, entered a new sphere. Deemed different from adults by virtue of their innocence, children warranted special care, protection, nurturing, and instruction as they moved through a distinct stage of development known as childhood, characterized by their own books, clothing, and playthings. In essence, they won the right to be children and to play, and toys became part of the formula. This attitude became even more entrenched by the 1950s when, during the the post-World War II baby boom, television invaded American homes attracting children with shows and advertising geared to them and espousing a child-centered, family-oriented agenda. In such a culture, where children are highly valued, the role of toys takes on greater importance, and several questions emerge, some practical, others ideological. What functions do, and should, toys provide? What messages do toys and the narratives that accompany them impart to children? How do toys reflect and affect attitudes and values in a dynamic, increasingly technological, careerist, and consumerist mass culture? Do we ever outgrow our toys? As artifacts of popular culture, toys embody the controversies of their time. Sites of philosophical struggle, they form a text that invites a discussion of contemporary issues regarding empowerment, control, social roles, and consumption. Then and Now One way to address these issues is to consider how toys have changed. In the summer of 2000, the Francis Land House in Virginia Beach, Virginia, which dates back to colonial times, presented an exhibit of American toys from the first half of the twentieth century. Titled "Memories of Childhood," it was made possible through the contributions of various friends and members of the Francis Land House Historic Society, who scoured their attics for treasured childhood play-- things. In one corner of the exhibition hall stood a large white doll house with painted green shutters that Henry Nichols Horton built in 1925 for his daughter Doris. An exact replica of the Horton Family home in Providence, Rhode Island, the doll house contained furniture and accessories that Horton hand crafted. Other toys in the exhibit included a Shirley Temple doll in a blue dress, a porcelain tea set painted with red flowers, a pair of rusty roller skates with a key, a clay marble game, two tattered brown teddy bears, a cowboy shirt and spurs, a 'Lil Orphan Annie stove previously used to bake mud pies, and several tin toys, such as a bus, train, and plane. …
孩子的玩具和老人的理智是两个季节的果实。没有什么比我们的玩具更能定义我们了。从婴儿期抓起色彩鲜艳的积木和可爱的泰迪熊,到成年期,我们选择的玩具是跑车、电子游戏和可爱或昂贵的收藏品,玩具在很大程度上说明了我们是谁,我们看重什么。有些玩具,如风筝、爆竹和铁环,本质上是娱乐的,使我们有乐趣。然而,玩具通常也有更大的目的,因为它们体现了我们的文化真理:我们希望培养什么样的技能,我们想培养什么样的态度,我们希望炫耀什么样的财产。玩具反映了我们社会对游戏的看法和对工作的看法之间的相互作用。所有的社会都有玩具,肯定了人类在某种形式的游戏中与一个物体——也许是一个娃娃或一个球——建立联系的基本需求。然而,直到16世纪晚期,“玩具”这个与琐碎、妄想和欲望联系在一起的词才开始指代儿童的玩具(Kuznets 10)。在19世纪末的美国,“玩具”的概念有了新的含义。在此之前,玩具——几乎都是自制的,通常是木制的——很少,因为孩子们要忍受没完没了的家务劳动,几乎没有时间玩耍。他们所做的玩具和游戏经常包含道德信息。到了工业时代,这种情况开始发生变化,大量生产的、负担得起的玩具出现了,工人们也有了购买玩具的收入。与此同时,以前被视为小大人并受到相应对待的儿童进入了一个新的领域。由于他们的天真,儿童被认为与成年人不同,他们需要特别的照顾、保护、培养和指导,因为他们经历了一个独特的发展阶段,即童年,他们有自己的书、衣服和玩具。从本质上讲,他们赢得了做孩子和玩耍的权利,玩具成为了他们的一部分。这种态度在20世纪50年代变得更加根深蒂固,当时正值二战后的婴儿潮时期,电视侵入美国家庭,用面向儿童的节目和广告吸引儿童,并倡导以儿童为中心、以家庭为导向的议程。在这样一种高度重视儿童的文化中,玩具的作用变得更加重要,并出现了一些问题,一些是实际的,另一些是意识形态的。玩具有什么功能,应该有什么功能?玩具和伴随它们的故事给孩子们传递了什么信息?玩具如何反映和影响的态度和价值观在一个动态的,日益科技,野心家,和消费主义的大众文化?我们会因为长大而失去我们的玩具吗?作为流行文化的产物,玩具体现了那个时代的争议。作为哲学斗争的场所,它们形成了一个文本,邀请人们讨论有关赋权、控制、社会角色和消费的当代问题。解决这些问题的一个方法是考虑玩具是如何变化的。2000年夏天,位于弗吉尼亚州弗吉尼亚海滩的Francis Land House,其历史可以追溯到殖民时期,展出了20世纪上半叶的美国玩具。这个名为“童年的回忆”的展览,是在弗朗西斯·兰德家历史协会的朋友和成员们的贡献下才得以完成的,他们在阁楼上搜寻珍贵的童年玩耍物品。在展厅的一个角落里矗立着一个白色的大娃娃屋,它的百叶窗涂成绿色,是亨利·尼科尔斯·霍顿在1925年为他的女儿多丽丝建造的。这个娃娃屋是罗德岛州普罗维登斯霍顿家的一模一样的复制品,里面有霍顿手工制作的家具和配件。展览中的其他玩具包括一个穿着蓝色裙子的秀兰·邓波儿娃娃,一套绘有红色花朵的瓷茶具,一双带钥匙的生锈轮滑鞋,一个粘土大理石游戏,两只破旧的棕色泰迪熊,一件牛仔衬衫和马刺,一个以前用来烤泥馅饼的“莉尔孤儿安妮”炉子,还有一些锡玩具,比如公共汽车、火车和飞机。…