{"title":"Administrative Response to Activism","authors":"Kenneth W. Borland","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-7274-9.CH002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"College student activism can cripple a campus for decades, as evidenced by the tragedies of Kent State University and Jackson State University. To prepare for the engagement of students, college administrators must prepare themselves, both in plans and in mindset, for the possibility of disruptive activism, and this begins with the identification of what acceptable activism can and should include. Building on the mindset that activism can indeed be a good thing, for both students and the institution, administrators must create priorities that protect the welfare of all involved, including the institution's brand and student learning. Subsequent thinking by campus leaders must maintain a humane and liberating response for students, and ultimately, although prepared, campus leaders must have a set of priorities planned that can incorporate and ultimately value the process of students speaking out on campus.","PeriodicalId":328506,"journal":{"name":"Exploring the Technological, Societal, and Institutional Dimensions of College Student Activism","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploring the Technological, Societal, and Institutional Dimensions of College Student Activism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7274-9.CH002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
College student activism can cripple a campus for decades, as evidenced by the tragedies of Kent State University and Jackson State University. To prepare for the engagement of students, college administrators must prepare themselves, both in plans and in mindset, for the possibility of disruptive activism, and this begins with the identification of what acceptable activism can and should include. Building on the mindset that activism can indeed be a good thing, for both students and the institution, administrators must create priorities that protect the welfare of all involved, including the institution's brand and student learning. Subsequent thinking by campus leaders must maintain a humane and liberating response for students, and ultimately, although prepared, campus leaders must have a set of priorities planned that can incorporate and ultimately value the process of students speaking out on campus.
肯特州立大学(Kent State University)和杰克逊州立大学(Jackson State University)的悲剧证明,大学生的激进主义可以让一个校园瘫痪几十年。为了为学生的参与做好准备,大学管理者必须在计划和心态上为破坏性行动主义的可能性做好准备,这首先要确定什么是可接受的行动主义可以而且应该包括的。基于这样一种心态,即激进主义确实可以是一件好事,对学生和学校都是如此,管理者必须制定优先事项,保护所有相关方的利益,包括学校的品牌和学生的学习。校园领导的后续思考必须保持对学生的人道和解放的回应,最终,尽管有准备,校园领导必须有一套优先计划,可以纳入并最终重视学生在校园发表意见的过程。