Informal Reasoning Profile of State Senior High School Students in Brebes Regency

F. Roshayanti, I. B. Minarti, Ariyat Afriadi
{"title":"Informal Reasoning Profile of State Senior High School Students in Brebes Regency","authors":"F. Roshayanti, I. B. Minarti, Ariyat Afriadi","doi":"10.55849/attasyrih.v7i1.152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to look at the Informal Reasoning profiles of public high school students in the Brebes Regency. Informal Reasoning is a type of thinking used by students in considering socio-scientific issues, which involves considering causation, pros and cons, and alternatives. The research was conducted at 11 public high schools in Brebes Regency using the Proportionate Stratified Random Sampling method. The research data was obtained through tests in the form of multiple-choice questions and essays that tested students' mastery of Informal Reasoning regarding issues such as HIV-AIDS, GMOs, and cloning. The results showed that 79.64% of students had good Informal Reasoning skills, 18.26% of students had very good abilities, and 2.10% of students had moderate abilities. These results indicate that most high school students in Brebes District have good Informal Reasoning skills in addressing socio-scientific issues. Comparing some of the results of students' Informal Reasoning between schools forms a pattern of possible causal factors, such as teachers' habits in teaching and giving questions, environment, region (rural and urban areas), as well as the availability of facilities and infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":372997,"journal":{"name":"At-Tasyrih: jurnal pendidikan dan hukum Islam","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"At-Tasyrih: jurnal pendidikan dan hukum Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55849/attasyrih.v7i1.152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

This study aims to look at the Informal Reasoning profiles of public high school students in the Brebes Regency. Informal Reasoning is a type of thinking used by students in considering socio-scientific issues, which involves considering causation, pros and cons, and alternatives. The research was conducted at 11 public high schools in Brebes Regency using the Proportionate Stratified Random Sampling method. The research data was obtained through tests in the form of multiple-choice questions and essays that tested students' mastery of Informal Reasoning regarding issues such as HIV-AIDS, GMOs, and cloning. The results showed that 79.64% of students had good Informal Reasoning skills, 18.26% of students had very good abilities, and 2.10% of students had moderate abilities. These results indicate that most high school students in Brebes District have good Informal Reasoning skills in addressing socio-scientific issues. Comparing some of the results of students' Informal Reasoning between schools forms a pattern of possible causal factors, such as teachers' habits in teaching and giving questions, environment, region (rural and urban areas), as well as the availability of facilities and infrastructure.
布里布省高中学生的非正式推理分析
本研究旨在研究布列布摄政时期公立高中学生的非正式推理能力。非正式推理是学生在考虑社会科学问题时使用的一种思维方式,包括考虑因果关系,利弊和替代方案。该研究采用比例分层随机抽样方法在布雷布摄政区的11所公立高中进行。研究数据是通过多项选择题和论文形式的测试获得的,这些测试测试了学生对艾滋病、转基因生物和克隆等问题的非正式推理的掌握程度。结果表明:79.64%的学生具有良好的非正式推理能力,18.26%的学生具有非常好的能力,2.10%的学生具有中等的能力。这些结果表明,布雷布地区的大多数高中生在解决社会科学问题方面具有良好的非正式推理技能。比较学校之间学生非正式推理的一些结果,形成了一个可能的因果因素模式,例如教师的教学和提问习惯,环境,地区(农村和城市地区),以及设施和基础设施的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信