Neural Correlates of error processing during grasping with invasive brain-machine interfaces*

Miri Benyamini, Samuel R. Nason, C. Chestek, M. Zacksenhouse
{"title":"Neural Correlates of error processing during grasping with invasive brain-machine interfaces*","authors":"Miri Benyamini, Samuel R. Nason, C. Chestek, M. Zacksenhouse","doi":"10.1109/NER.2019.8717020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) may generate more errors than those encountered during normal motor control. Thus, they provide an opportunity to investigate neural correlates of error processing. Characterizing neural correlates of error processing may, in turn, provide a tool for on-line correction of the errors that are made by the interface. We investigated neural correlates of error processing during BMI experiments in which monkeys controlled an animated hand on the screen to touch a ball by moving their own fingers. Short movement segments that were consistently toward or away from the target were labeled accordingly and used to train a classifier to differentiate between correct and erroneous movements based on the neural activity. The results indicate that despite the limited number of labeled segments and active neurons in the studied data, the classifier achieved a classification rate of 68% on testing. The full receiver operating curve (ROC) has been estimated and indicates that even when the false alarm is restricted to 5%, the classifier can detect 36% of the erroneous movements. Better results are expected when using more data, especially as more challenging grasping tasks are performed. Such a classifier could be used to improve the performance of BMIs by detecting and correcting erroneous movements.","PeriodicalId":356177,"journal":{"name":"2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NER.2019.8717020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) may generate more errors than those encountered during normal motor control. Thus, they provide an opportunity to investigate neural correlates of error processing. Characterizing neural correlates of error processing may, in turn, provide a tool for on-line correction of the errors that are made by the interface. We investigated neural correlates of error processing during BMI experiments in which monkeys controlled an animated hand on the screen to touch a ball by moving their own fingers. Short movement segments that were consistently toward or away from the target were labeled accordingly and used to train a classifier to differentiate between correct and erroneous movements based on the neural activity. The results indicate that despite the limited number of labeled segments and active neurons in the studied data, the classifier achieved a classification rate of 68% on testing. The full receiver operating curve (ROC) has been estimated and indicates that even when the false alarm is restricted to 5%, the classifier can detect 36% of the erroneous movements. Better results are expected when using more data, especially as more challenging grasping tasks are performed. Such a classifier could be used to improve the performance of BMIs by detecting and correcting erroneous movements.
有创脑机接口抓取过程中错误处理的神经关联研究*
脑机接口(bmi)可能比正常的运动控制产生更多的错误。因此,它们为研究错误处理的神经关联提供了机会。表征错误处理的神经相关物,反过来,可以提供一种工具,用于在线校正由接口产生的错误。在BMI实验中,我们研究了错误处理的神经关联。在BMI实验中,猴子通过移动自己的手指来控制屏幕上的一只动画手来触摸一个球。对始终朝向或远离目标的短运动片段进行相应的标记,并用于训练分类器,以根据神经活动区分正确和错误的运动。结果表明,尽管所研究数据中的标记片段和活动神经元数量有限,但该分类器在测试中实现了68%的分类率。完整的接收者工作曲线(ROC)已被估计,并表明,即使将假警报限制在5%,分类器也可以检测到36%的错误动作。当使用更多的数据时,期望得到更好的结果,特别是在执行更具挑战性的抓取任务时。这种分类器可以通过检测和纠正错误动作来提高bmi的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信