{"title":"ECONOMIC TERMINOLOGY: ANALYSIS OF TRANSLATION PECULIARITIES","authors":"T. Ahibalova, V. Miroshnychenko, N. Plotnikova","doi":"10.24919/2308-4863.1/29.209273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and currencies, names of participants in the economic system. Since the degree of semantic closeness between terminological units in the original language and the target language reveals the professional competence of the translator and taking into account the categorical principles of informative capacity and the high level of the system accuracy, the most productive ways of the term derivation are distinguished and described. It is revealed that transcoding is a common way of translation of internationalisms and two-component (or analytical) forms in the English economic nomination prevail quantitatively over one-component (or synthetic) ones. They are given preference because of their ability to convey the necessary differential features of phenomena and realities, to refine and concretize certain common concepts, translating them into the plane of narrow industry meaning. Based on the analysis, it is proved that in the list of morphological and syntactic means the most productive are two-component structural models, with the quantitative predominance of Adjective + Noun, Noun + Noun models, which is related to particular requirements for translation of economic terminology, such as adequacy and accuracy.","PeriodicalId":443470,"journal":{"name":"Humanities science current issues","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanities science current issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863.1/29.209273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
and currencies, names of participants in the economic system. Since the degree of semantic closeness between terminological units in the original language and the target language reveals the professional competence of the translator and taking into account the categorical principles of informative capacity and the high level of the system accuracy, the most productive ways of the term derivation are distinguished and described. It is revealed that transcoding is a common way of translation of internationalisms and two-component (or analytical) forms in the English economic nomination prevail quantitatively over one-component (or synthetic) ones. They are given preference because of their ability to convey the necessary differential features of phenomena and realities, to refine and concretize certain common concepts, translating them into the plane of narrow industry meaning. Based on the analysis, it is proved that in the list of morphological and syntactic means the most productive are two-component structural models, with the quantitative predominance of Adjective + Noun, Noun + Noun models, which is related to particular requirements for translation of economic terminology, such as adequacy and accuracy.