Gone with the Wind: Industry Development and the Evolution of Social Movement Influence

W. Carlos, W. Sine, Brandon H. Lee, Heather A. Haveman
{"title":"Gone with the Wind: Industry Development and the Evolution of Social Movement Influence","authors":"W. Carlos, W. Sine, Brandon H. Lee, Heather A. Haveman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2746274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent work linking social movements and organizations has shown that social movements can promote entrepreneurial activity in new industries. Social movements can increase acceptance of new industries among consumers, drum up state support, call entrepreneurs’ attention to new opportunities, connect entrepreneurs to resource providers, and promote the formation of supportive infrastructure. All of these actions facilitate new industry emergence and expansion. In this paper, we argue that when social movements successfully foster industry expansion, three related things happen. First, the movement-encouraged development of industry infrastructure reduces the need for continued support by social movements. Initially because of the difficulty of starting a new organization in a new sector, initial entrants are more likely to be highly motivated by ideology. Second, movements’ efforts on behalf of new industries increase the importance of resource availability: by improving opportunities to earn profits, entrepreneurs who are motivated more by financial considerations and less by movement ideologies are increasingly attracted to the industry; for such instrumentally motivated entrepreneurs, resources are more important than movement support. Third, industry growth motivates counter movements that compete with initiator movements, further reducing the beneficial impact of imitator movements. To test these arguments, we use panel data on the US wind power industry and related social movements. We conclude by considering the implications of our findings for the study of social movements, organizations, and entrepreneurship.","PeriodicalId":384705,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Civil Society & Social Movements (Sub-Topic)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Civil Society & Social Movements (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2746274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Recent work linking social movements and organizations has shown that social movements can promote entrepreneurial activity in new industries. Social movements can increase acceptance of new industries among consumers, drum up state support, call entrepreneurs’ attention to new opportunities, connect entrepreneurs to resource providers, and promote the formation of supportive infrastructure. All of these actions facilitate new industry emergence and expansion. In this paper, we argue that when social movements successfully foster industry expansion, three related things happen. First, the movement-encouraged development of industry infrastructure reduces the need for continued support by social movements. Initially because of the difficulty of starting a new organization in a new sector, initial entrants are more likely to be highly motivated by ideology. Second, movements’ efforts on behalf of new industries increase the importance of resource availability: by improving opportunities to earn profits, entrepreneurs who are motivated more by financial considerations and less by movement ideologies are increasingly attracted to the industry; for such instrumentally motivated entrepreneurs, resources are more important than movement support. Third, industry growth motivates counter movements that compete with initiator movements, further reducing the beneficial impact of imitator movements. To test these arguments, we use panel data on the US wind power industry and related social movements. We conclude by considering the implications of our findings for the study of social movements, organizations, and entrepreneurship.
《乱世佳人:产业发展与社会运动影响演变》
最近将社会运动和组织联系起来的工作表明,社会运动可以促进新兴行业的创业活动。社会运动可以提高消费者对新产业的接受度,争取国家的支持,唤起企业家对新机会的关注,将企业家与资源提供者联系起来,并促进支持性基础设施的形成。所有这些行动都促进了新产业的出现和发展。在本文中,我们认为当社会运动成功地促进产业扩张时,会发生三件相关的事情。首先,运动鼓励的工业基础设施发展减少了对社会运动持续支持的需要。最初,由于在一个新领域成立一个新组织的困难,最初的进入者更有可能受到意识形态的高度激励。其次,运动代表新兴产业的努力增加了资源可用性的重要性:通过改善赚取利润的机会,更多地出于财务考虑而不是运动意识形态的企业家越来越多地被吸引到该行业;对于这些工具驱动的企业家来说,资源比运动支持更重要。第三,行业增长激发了与发起者运动竞争的反运动,进一步减少了模仿者运动的有益影响。为了验证这些论点,我们使用了美国风力发电行业和相关社会运动的面板数据。最后,我们考虑了我们的发现对社会运动、组织和企业家精神研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信