Obtaining Voice-Over-IP Services: A Comparison Between Selection Processes Amongst Single Vendor Options And Multi-Vendor Options

T. Bandopadhyay, S. Bhattacharya
{"title":"Obtaining Voice-Over-IP Services: A Comparison Between Selection Processes Amongst Single Vendor Options And Multi-Vendor Options","authors":"T. Bandopadhyay, S. Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1109/INDIN.2006.275687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quality of service (QoS), availability and cost for availing VoIP services have become critical operational performance factors of many global organizations especially in the context of process outsourcing. Consequently, a number of business models and delivery models are being tried and tested across the industry sectors to get the best possible fit between the clients' demands for quality, cost and bandwidth from the VoIP providers and the supply-side of VoIP, i.e., what the service providers promise to give in the contracts or Service Level Agreements and what they are actually able to provide. The latest trend in the outsourcing industry shows that clients are looking for more multi-vendor options for procuring any service than a single vendor option. This model reduces risk and increases the negotiation advantages for the clients. Considering this phenomenon, in this paper, we have proposed two different ways to select vendors for VoIP: one in a single-vendor option, another in a multi-vendor option. In the single-vendor option we have used data envelopment analysis. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is not a new technique in itself at all, in fact, in this paper we have shown the various ways it has been applied in other domains including service domains like financial services and banking etc. The main strength of DEA in the context of this paper is its ability to generate an efficiency frontier, which can be used for selecting a VoIP provider or comparatively evaluating VoIP service providers' performance data. We have explained this approach using a simple example, and outlined the implementation possibilities with more complex variables and models. For the multi-vendor option, we have shown an approach using goal programming. Using the same constraint sets as in the DEA formulation, the only difference that we have assumed here is that the client can distribute its VoIP service requirements to more than one vendor in contrast to a single- vendor situation in the DEA example. Goal programming is then used to select the optimal distribution of VoIP service requirements to a number of providers.","PeriodicalId":120426,"journal":{"name":"2006 4th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 4th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN.2006.275687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The quality of service (QoS), availability and cost for availing VoIP services have become critical operational performance factors of many global organizations especially in the context of process outsourcing. Consequently, a number of business models and delivery models are being tried and tested across the industry sectors to get the best possible fit between the clients' demands for quality, cost and bandwidth from the VoIP providers and the supply-side of VoIP, i.e., what the service providers promise to give in the contracts or Service Level Agreements and what they are actually able to provide. The latest trend in the outsourcing industry shows that clients are looking for more multi-vendor options for procuring any service than a single vendor option. This model reduces risk and increases the negotiation advantages for the clients. Considering this phenomenon, in this paper, we have proposed two different ways to select vendors for VoIP: one in a single-vendor option, another in a multi-vendor option. In the single-vendor option we have used data envelopment analysis. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is not a new technique in itself at all, in fact, in this paper we have shown the various ways it has been applied in other domains including service domains like financial services and banking etc. The main strength of DEA in the context of this paper is its ability to generate an efficiency frontier, which can be used for selecting a VoIP provider or comparatively evaluating VoIP service providers' performance data. We have explained this approach using a simple example, and outlined the implementation possibilities with more complex variables and models. For the multi-vendor option, we have shown an approach using goal programming. Using the same constraint sets as in the DEA formulation, the only difference that we have assumed here is that the client can distribute its VoIP service requirements to more than one vendor in contrast to a single- vendor situation in the DEA example. Goal programming is then used to select the optimal distribution of VoIP service requirements to a number of providers.
获取ip语音服务:单一供应商选择和多供应商选择之间的选择过程的比较
服务质量(QoS)、可用性和使用VoIP服务的成本已经成为许多全球性组织的关键运营绩效因素,尤其是在流程外包的背景下。因此,许多商业模式和交付模式正在整个行业部门进行尝试和测试,以尽可能地满足客户对VoIP提供商对质量、成本和带宽的要求,以及VoIP的供应方,即服务提供商在合同或服务水平协议中承诺提供的内容以及他们实际能够提供的内容。外包行业的最新趋势表明,客户正在寻找更多的多供应商选择来采购任何服务,而不是单一的供应商选择。该模型为客户降低了风险,增加了谈判优势。考虑到这一现象,在本文中,我们提出了两种不同的方法来选择VoIP供应商:一种是单一供应商选项,另一种是多供应商选项。在单一供应商选项中,我们使用了数据包络分析。数据包络分析(DEA)本身并不是一项新技术,事实上,在本文中,我们已经展示了它在其他领域的各种应用方式,包括金融服务和银行等服务领域。本文中DEA的主要优势在于其产生效率边界的能力,该效率边界可用于选择VoIP提供商或比较评估VoIP服务提供商的性能数据。我们使用一个简单的示例解释了这种方法,并概述了使用更复杂的变量和模型实现的可能性。对于多供应商选项,我们已经展示了使用目标规划的方法。使用与DEA公式中相同的约束集,我们在这里假设的唯一区别是,与DEA示例中的单一供应商情况相比,客户端可以将其VoIP服务需求分发给多个供应商。然后使用目标规划来选择VoIP服务需求的最佳分布到多个提供商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信