Perspective and Practices of Social Sustainability across Construction Project Lifecycle

N. E. Kordi, S. Belayutham, C. K. C. Che Ibrahim
{"title":"Perspective and Practices of Social Sustainability across Construction Project Lifecycle","authors":"N. E. Kordi, S. Belayutham, C. K. C. Che Ibrahim","doi":"10.11113/intrest.v16n2.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research has suggested incorporating social sustainability into the construction project lifecycle. However, the understanding and means of incorporating social sustainability practices throughout the project lifecycle remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to fill a knowledge gap by investigating the “real experiences” and “perspectives” of industry practitioners on social sustainability practices throughout the construction project lifecycle. The study began with a literature review to identify social sustainability attributes, which were then confirmed through structured interviews with 15 practitioners, and the data were then analysed thematically. The practitioners unanimously agreed that the social sustainability attributes could be divided into nine (9) main attributes along with the 20 sub-attributes, namely: 1) safety and health; 2) impact assessment; 3) employment; 4) stakeholder involvement; 5) satisfaction; 6) quality education; 7) social procurement; 8) protection design/belonging; and 9) human right. The practitioners have positioned the nine main social sustainability attributes into the different phases of the construction project lifecycle, based on actual practices in their projects and their professional opinion on the subject matter. Stakeholder Involvement shows the largest gap for improvement (31.7%), followed by the attributes of Worker Health and Safety (23.3%), Protection of Cultural Heritage (21.7%), and Social Procurement (21.7%). Findings from this study would benefit the industry stakeholders in incorporating social sustainability at different phases of the construction project lifecycle. The framework gives a comprehensive understanding of social sustainability that can be utilized to enhance construction project planning and sustainable development. The novelty also lies in the consolidation of social sustainability attributes for practitioners in construction that could act as a reference for any future developments related to social sustainability in construction.","PeriodicalId":139660,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Real Estate Studies","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Real Estate Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11113/intrest.v16n2.232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has suggested incorporating social sustainability into the construction project lifecycle. However, the understanding and means of incorporating social sustainability practices throughout the project lifecycle remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to fill a knowledge gap by investigating the “real experiences” and “perspectives” of industry practitioners on social sustainability practices throughout the construction project lifecycle. The study began with a literature review to identify social sustainability attributes, which were then confirmed through structured interviews with 15 practitioners, and the data were then analysed thematically. The practitioners unanimously agreed that the social sustainability attributes could be divided into nine (9) main attributes along with the 20 sub-attributes, namely: 1) safety and health; 2) impact assessment; 3) employment; 4) stakeholder involvement; 5) satisfaction; 6) quality education; 7) social procurement; 8) protection design/belonging; and 9) human right. The practitioners have positioned the nine main social sustainability attributes into the different phases of the construction project lifecycle, based on actual practices in their projects and their professional opinion on the subject matter. Stakeholder Involvement shows the largest gap for improvement (31.7%), followed by the attributes of Worker Health and Safety (23.3%), Protection of Cultural Heritage (21.7%), and Social Procurement (21.7%). Findings from this study would benefit the industry stakeholders in incorporating social sustainability at different phases of the construction project lifecycle. The framework gives a comprehensive understanding of social sustainability that can be utilized to enhance construction project planning and sustainable development. The novelty also lies in the consolidation of social sustainability attributes for practitioners in construction that could act as a reference for any future developments related to social sustainability in construction.
建设项目全生命周期社会可持续发展的视角与实践
之前的研究建议将社会可持续性纳入建设项目的生命周期。然而,在整个项目生命周期中融入社会可持续性实践的理解和方法仍然不清楚。因此,本文的目的是通过调查行业从业者在整个建设项目生命周期中对社会可持续发展实践的“真实经验”和“观点”来填补知识空白。该研究首先通过文献综述来确定社会可持续性属性,然后通过对15名从业者的结构化访谈来确认这些属性,然后对数据进行主题分析。从业者一致认为,社会可持续性属性可分为9个主要属性和20个子属性,即:1)安全与健康;2)影响评价;3)就业;4)利益相关者参与;5)满意度;6)素质教育;7)社会采购;8)保护设计/归属;9)人权。从业人员根据项目的实际实践和对主题的专业意见,将九个主要的社会可持续性属性定位到建设项目生命周期的不同阶段。利益相关者参与显示出最大的改进差距(31.7%),其次是工人健康和安全属性(23.3%),文化遗产保护(21.7%)和社会采购(21.7%)。这项研究的结果将有利于行业利益相关者在建设项目生命周期的不同阶段纳入社会可持续性。该框架提供了对社会可持续性的全面理解,可用于加强建设项目规划和可持续发展。其新颖性还在于巩固了建筑从业者的社会可持续性属性,可以作为与建筑社会可持续性相关的任何未来发展的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信