Image quality in abdominal CT: A comparison of two reconstruction algorithms in Filtered Back Projection (FBP)

A. Rusandu, Adrian Beck, Atle Hegge, G. Engh
{"title":"Image quality in abdominal CT: A comparison of two reconstruction algorithms in Filtered Back Projection (FBP)","authors":"A. Rusandu, Adrian Beck, Atle Hegge, G. Engh","doi":"10.47724/mirtj.2022.i02.a001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the choice of kernel on the image quality in abdominal CT images with focus on liver lesion visibility. Methods: In this comparative study 84 abdominal CT examinations of patients with liver lesions that included parallel series reconstructed with two different kernels (B30 and B45) were analyzed. The subjective assessment of image quality was performed using visual grading analysis based on anatomical criteria, liver lesion visibility and perceived image quality. Objective image quality was assessed by measurements of Hounsfield unit (HU) values (average and standard deviation) in abdominal organs and calculations of contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR). Results: B30 kernel performed significantly better than B45 in all criteria except for sharpness. The most considerable improvement of the image quality was in terms of subjective experienced image noise, overall diagnostic image quality and visually sharp reproduction of liver lesions. The physical measurements showed that CNR increased by up to 46% when using B30. Conclusions: Using a B30 kernel algorithm for image reconstruction reduces noise and by that improves image quality and diagnostic accuracy significantly when compared to B45.","PeriodicalId":271343,"journal":{"name":"MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIOTHERAPY JOURNAL","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIOTHERAPY JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47724/mirtj.2022.i02.a001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the choice of kernel on the image quality in abdominal CT images with focus on liver lesion visibility. Methods: In this comparative study 84 abdominal CT examinations of patients with liver lesions that included parallel series reconstructed with two different kernels (B30 and B45) were analyzed. The subjective assessment of image quality was performed using visual grading analysis based on anatomical criteria, liver lesion visibility and perceived image quality. Objective image quality was assessed by measurements of Hounsfield unit (HU) values (average and standard deviation) in abdominal organs and calculations of contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR). Results: B30 kernel performed significantly better than B45 in all criteria except for sharpness. The most considerable improvement of the image quality was in terms of subjective experienced image noise, overall diagnostic image quality and visually sharp reproduction of liver lesions. The physical measurements showed that CNR increased by up to 46% when using B30. Conclusions: Using a B30 kernel algorithm for image reconstruction reduces noise and by that improves image quality and diagnostic accuracy significantly when compared to B45.
腹部CT图像质量:两种滤波后投影(FBP)重建算法的比较
目的:本研究的目的是评估核的选择对腹部CT图像质量的影响,重点是肝脏病变的可见性。方法:对84例肝脏病变患者的腹部CT检查结果进行对比分析,包括用两种不同核(B30和B45)重建的平行序列。采用基于解剖标准、肝脏病变可见性和感知图像质量的视觉分级分析对图像质量进行主观评价。通过测量腹部脏器的霍斯菲尔德单位(Hounsfield unit, HU)值(平均值和标准差)和计算噪比(contrast- and -noise ratio, CNR)来评估客观图像质量。结果:除清晰度外,B30核在所有指标上均优于B45核。图像质量最显著的改善是在主观体验图像噪声、整体诊断图像质量和肝脏病变的视觉清晰再现方面。物理测量表明,当使用B30时,CNR增加了46%。结论:与B45相比,使用B30核算法进行图像重建可以降低噪声,从而显著提高图像质量和诊断准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信