Skin Cancer Classification Based On Convolutional Neural Network

Jiaqi Li
{"title":"Skin Cancer Classification Based On Convolutional Neural Network","authors":"Jiaqi Li","doi":"10.1109/icaice54393.2021.00108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Skin cancer is a kind of cancer that is usually diagnosed by images from dermoscopy. In recent years, researchers have attempted to utilize deep learning technology, especially convolution neural networks (CNN), in the recognition of skin cancer images. Many CNN models have already performed great applicability, like DenseNet, Inception, and Xception. This paper carried a comparative experiment on ISIC 2019 challenge dataset which includes 25,331 skin cancer images of 8 different kinds. On the classification task on the ISIC 2019, it introduced 6 models, VGGNet19, ResNet50, ResNet152, DenseNet201, Inception-v3, and Xception, then conducted a comparative analysis of their performance involving 2 methods (data enhance and transfer learning) and 2 optimizers (Adam and SGD), aiming to explore the impact of different methods and structures on the accuracy, in order to find traits for potential models of higher accuracy. In the 24 groups of results, Xception with data enhance, transfer learning (pretraining) and Adam optimizer had the highest accuracy of 83.8%, while VGGNet19 without transfer learning had the lowest of 66.67%. The influence of transfer leaning is positive on all models, both on accuracy and training time; similar to Adam optimizer, except for a noticeable enhancement effect on Inception-v3 and Xception. The data enhance method applied in this paper had a weak, non-directed impact. Possible reasons for this phenomenon are discussed in depth in the study.","PeriodicalId":388444,"journal":{"name":"2021 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering (ICAICE)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering (ICAICE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/icaice54393.2021.00108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Skin cancer is a kind of cancer that is usually diagnosed by images from dermoscopy. In recent years, researchers have attempted to utilize deep learning technology, especially convolution neural networks (CNN), in the recognition of skin cancer images. Many CNN models have already performed great applicability, like DenseNet, Inception, and Xception. This paper carried a comparative experiment on ISIC 2019 challenge dataset which includes 25,331 skin cancer images of 8 different kinds. On the classification task on the ISIC 2019, it introduced 6 models, VGGNet19, ResNet50, ResNet152, DenseNet201, Inception-v3, and Xception, then conducted a comparative analysis of their performance involving 2 methods (data enhance and transfer learning) and 2 optimizers (Adam and SGD), aiming to explore the impact of different methods and structures on the accuracy, in order to find traits for potential models of higher accuracy. In the 24 groups of results, Xception with data enhance, transfer learning (pretraining) and Adam optimizer had the highest accuracy of 83.8%, while VGGNet19 without transfer learning had the lowest of 66.67%. The influence of transfer leaning is positive on all models, both on accuracy and training time; similar to Adam optimizer, except for a noticeable enhancement effect on Inception-v3 and Xception. The data enhance method applied in this paper had a weak, non-directed impact. Possible reasons for this phenomenon are discussed in depth in the study.
基于卷积神经网络的皮肤癌分类
皮肤癌是一种通常通过皮肤镜图像诊断的癌症。近年来,研究人员试图利用深度学习技术,特别是卷积神经网络(CNN)来识别皮肤癌图像。许多CNN模型已经表现出了很强的适用性,比如DenseNet、Inception和Xception。本文在ISIC 2019挑战数据集上进行了对比实验,该数据集包含8种不同类型的25331张皮肤癌图像。在ISIC 2019上的分类任务中,引入了VGGNet19、ResNet50、ResNet152、DenseNet201、Inception-v3和Xception 6个模型,并对它们的2种方法(数据增强和迁移学习)和2种优化器(Adam和SGD)的性能进行了对比分析,旨在探讨不同方法和结构对准确率的影响,寻找潜在的更高准确率模型的特征。24组结果中,经过数据增强的Xception、迁移学习(预训练)和Adam优化器的准确率最高,为83.8%,未经过迁移学习的VGGNet19准确率最低,为66.67%。迁移学习对所有模型的准确率和训练时间的影响均为正;类似于Adam优化器,除了在Inception-v3和Xception上有明显的增强效果。本文采用的数据增强方法具有微弱的非定向影响。本研究对造成这一现象的可能原因进行了深入的探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信