{"title":"AKIBAT PERCERAIAN TERHADAP HARTA BERSAMA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 1470 K/PDT/2018)","authors":"Jacelyn Liwandi, E. Hartati","doi":"10.33751/palar.v8i3.5830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstrakPenelitian ini membahas mengenai akibat terjadinya perceraian terhadap harta bersama yang dimiliki. Harta bersama diatur dalam Pasal 35 dan Pasal 36 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974. Namun akibat putusnya perkawinan karena perceraian sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 37 Undang-Undang Perkawinan, merujuk pada peraturan atau hukum agama, hukum adat, atau hukum-hukumnya yang lain. Meskipun pembagian harta bersama setelah terjadinya perceraian telah diatur berdasarkan ketentuan di atas, namun masih terjadi kesulitan dalam pelaksanannya. Sehingga menimbulkan sengketa antar kedua belah pihak. Hal ini dikarenakan keserakahan dan keegoisan dari para pihak yang ingin menguasai harta lebih banyak. Seperti dalam putusan nomor 1470 K/PDT/2018, mantan suami menguasai harta bersama tersebut dan tidak membaginya kepada mantan isteri. Dari keadaan inilah timbul ketidakpuasan maupun ketidakadilan yang pada akhirnya menimbulkan perselisihan di antara mantan suami isteri tersebut. Kata Kunci : Harta Bersama, Perkawinan, Perceraian, Pembagian Harta Bersama Setelah Perceraian AbstractThis study discusses the consequences of divorce on joint assets owned. Joint assets are regulated in Article 35 and Article 36 of Law Number 1 of 1974. However, due to the dissolution of a marriage due to divorce as regulated in Article 37 of the Marriage Law, it refers to religious regulations or laws, customary law, or other laws. Although the distribution of joint assets after the divorce has been regulated based on the above provisions, there are still difficulties in its implementation. This creates a dispute between the two parties. This is due to the greed and selfishness of the parties who want to control more property. As in decision number 1470 K/PDT/2018, the ex-husband controls the joint property and does not share it with the ex-wife. From this situation, dissatisfaction and injustice arise which ultimately lead to disputes between the ex-husband and wife. Keywords: Joint Assets, Marriage, Divorce, Distribution of Joint Assets After Divorce","PeriodicalId":239079,"journal":{"name":"PALAR | PAKUAN LAW REVIEW","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PALAR | PAKUAN LAW REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v8i3.5830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstrakPenelitian ini membahas mengenai akibat terjadinya perceraian terhadap harta bersama yang dimiliki. Harta bersama diatur dalam Pasal 35 dan Pasal 36 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974. Namun akibat putusnya perkawinan karena perceraian sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 37 Undang-Undang Perkawinan, merujuk pada peraturan atau hukum agama, hukum adat, atau hukum-hukumnya yang lain. Meskipun pembagian harta bersama setelah terjadinya perceraian telah diatur berdasarkan ketentuan di atas, namun masih terjadi kesulitan dalam pelaksanannya. Sehingga menimbulkan sengketa antar kedua belah pihak. Hal ini dikarenakan keserakahan dan keegoisan dari para pihak yang ingin menguasai harta lebih banyak. Seperti dalam putusan nomor 1470 K/PDT/2018, mantan suami menguasai harta bersama tersebut dan tidak membaginya kepada mantan isteri. Dari keadaan inilah timbul ketidakpuasan maupun ketidakadilan yang pada akhirnya menimbulkan perselisihan di antara mantan suami isteri tersebut. Kata Kunci : Harta Bersama, Perkawinan, Perceraian, Pembagian Harta Bersama Setelah Perceraian AbstractThis study discusses the consequences of divorce on joint assets owned. Joint assets are regulated in Article 35 and Article 36 of Law Number 1 of 1974. However, due to the dissolution of a marriage due to divorce as regulated in Article 37 of the Marriage Law, it refers to religious regulations or laws, customary law, or other laws. Although the distribution of joint assets after the divorce has been regulated based on the above provisions, there are still difficulties in its implementation. This creates a dispute between the two parties. This is due to the greed and selfishness of the parties who want to control more property. As in decision number 1470 K/PDT/2018, the ex-husband controls the joint property and does not share it with the ex-wife. From this situation, dissatisfaction and injustice arise which ultimately lead to disputes between the ex-husband and wife. Keywords: Joint Assets, Marriage, Divorce, Distribution of Joint Assets After Divorce
本研究的摘要讨论了离婚对共同拥有财产的影响。“共同的宝藏”于1974年第35条和第36条第1条。然而中断造成的婚姻因为离婚按照婚姻法第37章上的安排,指宗教、法律、习俗的法律或法规,或其他的国家的法律。虽然之后一起离婚财产分配根据上面的条款已设置,但仍然发生在pelaksanannya遇到麻烦。这引发了双方的争端。这是因为那些想要夺取更多财产的人的贪婪和自私。像1470号判决K -哈特利牧师在2018年,前夫一起统治的宝藏,并没有和前妻分享。从静止状态是产生不满和不公正的最终这些前夫妻之间产生了分歧。关键词:分享财产、婚姻、离婚、离婚后共享财产的分割。联合资产在第35条和1974年第36条法律中得到遵守。但是,到期dissolution of a marriage》到期到美国离婚率regulated在文章37《婚姻法律,这refers to宗教regulations)或间谍活动、customary Law或其他间谍活动。尽管发行后的联合资产的分布一直基于社区需求,但实现过程中仍然存在困难。这个creates a dispute《二号各方之间。这是丹《贪婪》和《世卫组织各方selfishness想控制更多的财产。美国在决定2018 1470号K -哈特利牧师,《ex-husband controls the联合财产和确实不是with the ex-wife分享它。从这种情况下,真正的不满和不公正导致前夫和妻子之间的不和。重点:合并资产、婚姻、离婚、离婚后裁员的分配