Beyond the Box: Innovation Policy in an Innovation-Driven Economy

B. Kahin
{"title":"Beyond the Box: Innovation Policy in an Innovation-Driven Economy","authors":"B. Kahin","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2209352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Everybody agrees that innovation is important to our nation’s economic growth and future prosperity, but what can the government do to promote it? The consensus of four years ago focused on remedying our perceived competitive shortcomings in science education and research, especially in the physical sciences. Today, the question takes on new urgency with the recognition that much of the economic growth experienced over the past decade was illusory. For the long term, we need to take a closer look at the institutions that enable innovation, not only to see how they can be better coordinated but also how they can respond to the evolving forms and practice of innovation. This kind of adaptive intelligence has not been a strong point of the federal government, but it is essential to long-term economic growth and security. It will require infusing competence, innovation, and entrepreneurship into the government. Yet it also means recognizing that the capacity and role of government is limited, and that the functions of government are subject to high standards of transparency, accountability, and participation. A national commitment to innovation requires not only remediation but exploiting our strengths and enhancing the fabric of innovation, especially in the social, commercial, and institutional applications of technology. Innovation policy as practiced to date tends to take a top-down macroeconomic approach that views public research funding and tax credits as the primary policy tools. Those are important tools, but they are limited (and costly) and get caught up political processes that have become all too familiar. Important as they are, they should not distract from a closer appreciation and understanding of the processes of innovation — processes that can be improved by a focused and coordinated approach to standards, infrastructure, enabling technology, clusters, and patents, an approach that takes into account evolving practices and models in the many contexts in which innovation takes place.","PeriodicalId":248722,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: National Innovation Systems (Sub-Topic)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: National Innovation Systems (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2209352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Everybody agrees that innovation is important to our nation’s economic growth and future prosperity, but what can the government do to promote it? The consensus of four years ago focused on remedying our perceived competitive shortcomings in science education and research, especially in the physical sciences. Today, the question takes on new urgency with the recognition that much of the economic growth experienced over the past decade was illusory. For the long term, we need to take a closer look at the institutions that enable innovation, not only to see how they can be better coordinated but also how they can respond to the evolving forms and practice of innovation. This kind of adaptive intelligence has not been a strong point of the federal government, but it is essential to long-term economic growth and security. It will require infusing competence, innovation, and entrepreneurship into the government. Yet it also means recognizing that the capacity and role of government is limited, and that the functions of government are subject to high standards of transparency, accountability, and participation. A national commitment to innovation requires not only remediation but exploiting our strengths and enhancing the fabric of innovation, especially in the social, commercial, and institutional applications of technology. Innovation policy as practiced to date tends to take a top-down macroeconomic approach that views public research funding and tax credits as the primary policy tools. Those are important tools, but they are limited (and costly) and get caught up political processes that have become all too familiar. Important as they are, they should not distract from a closer appreciation and understanding of the processes of innovation — processes that can be improved by a focused and coordinated approach to standards, infrastructure, enabling technology, clusters, and patents, an approach that takes into account evolving practices and models in the many contexts in which innovation takes place.
跳出框框:创新驱动型经济中的创新政策
每个人都同意创新对我们国家的经济增长和未来繁荣很重要,但是政府能做些什么来促进创新呢?四年前的共识集中在弥补我们在科学教育和研究方面的明显竞争缺陷,特别是在物理科学方面。如今,随着人们认识到过去10年经历的大部分经济增长都是虚幻的,这个问题变得更加紧迫。从长远来看,我们需要更仔细地审视推动创新的制度,不仅要看它们如何更好地协调,还要看它们如何应对不断变化的创新形式和实践。这种适应性智能一直不是联邦政府的强项,但它对长期经济增长和安全至关重要。这需要向政府注入能力、创新和创业精神。然而,这也意味着认识到政府的能力和作用是有限的,政府的职能必须遵守透明度、问责制和参与的高标准。一个国家对创新的承诺不仅需要补救,还需要利用我们的优势,加强创新的结构,特别是在技术的社会、商业和机构应用方面。迄今为止实施的创新政策往往采取自上而下的宏观经济方法,将公共研究资助和税收抵免视为主要政策工具。这些都是重要的工具,但它们是有限的(而且昂贵的),并且会陷入已经变得太熟悉的政治进程中。尽管它们很重要,但它们不应分散我们对创新过程的更密切的欣赏和理解——通过对标准、基础设施、使能技术、集群和专利采取集中和协调的方法,可以改善创新过程,这种方法考虑到在发生创新的许多背景下不断发展的实践和模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信