The Human Body within Funerary Archaeology Research: from the Bearer of Material Culture to la Raison d'Être of the Funerary Complex

C. Crețu
{"title":"The Human Body within Funerary Archaeology Research: from the Bearer of Material Culture to la Raison d'Être of the Funerary Complex","authors":"C. Crețu","doi":"10.31178/cicsa.2016.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The interest for graves, cemeteries, and other funerary structures was a constant in archaeologicalresearch since the pioneering period of this discipline in the 19th century. With regard to the actual human body (buried or treated in other various ways), archaeologists and anthropologists took different approaches which can be best understood only by taking into account the wider context in which they conducted their research. In this paper I will try to observe the evolution of the way in which the human body was regarded in the framework offunerary archaeology. I begin my analysis from the 19th century, when scholars operated a selection andretention mainly of skulls from the excavation in order to be able to classify individuals into ”races” and with astrong emphasis on the study of the associated artefacts, and conclude at the end of the 20th century, when the human body is at the heart of a complex research (it becomes the reason of being of the whole funerary ensemble) comprising the natural (field anthropology) and the social sciences and humanities.","PeriodicalId":244215,"journal":{"name":"Revista CICSA online, Serie Nouă","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista CICSA online, Serie Nouă","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31178/cicsa.2016.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interest for graves, cemeteries, and other funerary structures was a constant in archaeologicalresearch since the pioneering period of this discipline in the 19th century. With regard to the actual human body (buried or treated in other various ways), archaeologists and anthropologists took different approaches which can be best understood only by taking into account the wider context in which they conducted their research. In this paper I will try to observe the evolution of the way in which the human body was regarded in the framework offunerary archaeology. I begin my analysis from the 19th century, when scholars operated a selection andretention mainly of skulls from the excavation in order to be able to classify individuals into ”races” and with astrong emphasis on the study of the associated artefacts, and conclude at the end of the 20th century, when the human body is at the heart of a complex research (it becomes the reason of being of the whole funerary ensemble) comprising the natural (field anthropology) and the social sciences and humanities.
墓葬考古研究中的人体:从物质文化的承载者到墓葬群的存在理由Être
自19世纪这一学科的开拓时期以来,对坟墓、墓地和其他丧葬结构的兴趣一直是考古学研究的一个不变的方向。至于实际的人体(埋葬或以其他各种方式处理),考古学家和人类学家采取了不同的方法,只有考虑到他们进行研究的更广泛的背景,才能最好地理解这些方法。在这篇论文中,我将试图观察人体在考古学框架内被视为方式的演变。我的分析从19世纪开始,当时学者们主要从挖掘的头骨中进行选择和保留,以便能够将个体划分为“种族”,并着重研究相关的人工制品,并在20世纪末得出结论:当人体成为一项复杂研究的核心时(它成为整个葬礼整体存在的原因),包括自然(现场人类学)和社会科学和人文科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信