Aportes da crítica hermenêutica do direito para uma leitura não solipsista do direito estrangeiro em uma perspectiva culturalista

Laerte Radtke Karnopp, Jael Sânera Sigales Gonçalves
{"title":"Aportes da crítica hermenêutica do direito para uma leitura não solipsista do direito estrangeiro em uma perspectiva culturalista","authors":"Laerte Radtke Karnopp, Jael Sânera Sigales Gonçalves","doi":"10.52028/rihj.v21.i33.art02.sp","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the culturalist theory of Legrand (2017; 2018) about the interpretation of foreign law, affiliated to a critical theory of comparative law, opposed to the positivist theory with a functionalist methodology, which defends an objectivist interpretation and the identification of similarities between the legal systems. It demonstrates that, at the same time, culturalist theory is also concerned with a non-subjectivist interpretation and supports the importance of a hermeneutic interpretation, in the same way as the Hermeneutic Criticism of Law. The research problem concerns the contributions of this theory, with the culturalist theory, to a non-objectivist/subjectivist interpretation of its object, based on the hypothesis that it offers contributions to a non-solipsistic interpretation of foreign law, considering the overcoming of the subject-object scheme. The research employs theoretical-descriptive methodology and concludes that the Hermeneutic Criticism of Law contributes with concepts and “method” to the culturalist comparative theory.","PeriodicalId":448198,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rihj.v21.i33.art02.sp","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the culturalist theory of Legrand (2017; 2018) about the interpretation of foreign law, affiliated to a critical theory of comparative law, opposed to the positivist theory with a functionalist methodology, which defends an objectivist interpretation and the identification of similarities between the legal systems. It demonstrates that, at the same time, culturalist theory is also concerned with a non-subjectivist interpretation and supports the importance of a hermeneutic interpretation, in the same way as the Hermeneutic Criticism of Law. The research problem concerns the contributions of this theory, with the culturalist theory, to a non-objectivist/subjectivist interpretation of its object, based on the hypothesis that it offers contributions to a non-solipsistic interpretation of foreign law, considering the overcoming of the subject-object scheme. The research employs theoretical-descriptive methodology and concludes that the Hermeneutic Criticism of Law contributes with concepts and “method” to the culturalist comparative theory.
法律诠释学批判对非唯我主义文化视角下外国法解读的贡献
文章介绍了勒格朗(2017;2018)关于对外国法律的解释,附属于比较法的批判理论,反对具有功能主义方法论的实证主义理论,后者捍卫客观主义解释和识别法律制度之间的相似性。与此同时,它表明,文化主义理论也关注非主观主义的解释,并支持解释学解释的重要性,就像《法律的解释学批评》一样。研究问题涉及这一理论与文化主义理论对其客体的非客观主义/主观主义解释的贡献,其基础假设是它对外国法的非唯我主义解释做出了贡献,考虑到主体-客体图式的克服。研究采用理论-描述的方法论,认为《法律解释学批判》以概念和“方法”为文化主义比较理论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信