Representation and Ethics: The Making of the Islamic World from a Place of Exile

A. Tayob
{"title":"Representation and Ethics: The Making of the Islamic World from a Place of Exile","authors":"A. Tayob","doi":"10.1515/9783110726534-012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": I use Edward Said’s metaphor of exile to identify an archive that offers an alternative discourse in the study of Islam. By drawing on Western and Muslim traditions, this archive occupies a place of exile that does more than constructing a representation of the Muslim world. Like Said’s work, it continues the critique of Orientalism. In addition, it includes a deliberation on ethics that has generally eluded the dominant discourse on the making and unmaking of the Islamic World. I contrast this archive with a post-Orientalist discourse that sometimes takes a deconstructivist approach to Islam, and sometimes one that emphasizes agency. The use of agency draws attention to Muslim imbrication in the social, political, and religious fields, but fails to account for political and economic hegemonies. Such strategies side-step the continuing dominance of Western political power games in Muslim societies and states. I therefore turn to scholars in exile and propose that their interest in critique and ethics offers a different way of imagining the Islamic world. Their questions and concern offer a different perspective to ‘post-Saidian’ Islamic Studies. locating and explaining, in historical-comparative, sociological terms, the type of break-through that allowed, through the shaping of notions of transcendence, for the emergence of a type of human reflexivity conventionally identified as the passage from the narrativity of mythos to the rationality of logos . 16","PeriodicalId":151130,"journal":{"name":"Claiming and Making Muslim Worlds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Claiming and Making Muslim Worlds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110726534-012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: I use Edward Said’s metaphor of exile to identify an archive that offers an alternative discourse in the study of Islam. By drawing on Western and Muslim traditions, this archive occupies a place of exile that does more than constructing a representation of the Muslim world. Like Said’s work, it continues the critique of Orientalism. In addition, it includes a deliberation on ethics that has generally eluded the dominant discourse on the making and unmaking of the Islamic World. I contrast this archive with a post-Orientalist discourse that sometimes takes a deconstructivist approach to Islam, and sometimes one that emphasizes agency. The use of agency draws attention to Muslim imbrication in the social, political, and religious fields, but fails to account for political and economic hegemonies. Such strategies side-step the continuing dominance of Western political power games in Muslim societies and states. I therefore turn to scholars in exile and propose that their interest in critique and ethics offers a different way of imagining the Islamic world. Their questions and concern offer a different perspective to ‘post-Saidian’ Islamic Studies. locating and explaining, in historical-comparative, sociological terms, the type of break-through that allowed, through the shaping of notions of transcendence, for the emergence of a type of human reflexivity conventionally identified as the passage from the narrativity of mythos to the rationality of logos . 16
再现与伦理:伊斯兰世界在流亡之地的形成
:我用爱德华·赛义德关于流亡的比喻来确定一个档案,它为伊斯兰教的研究提供了另一种话语。通过借鉴西方和穆斯林的传统,这个档案占据了一个流亡的地方,而不仅仅是构建一个穆斯林世界的代表。就像赛义德的作品一样,它延续了对东方主义的批判。此外,它还包括了对道德的思考,这一思考通常避开了关于伊斯兰世界的形成和毁灭的主流论述。我将这个档案与后东方主义的论述进行对比,后者有时对伊斯兰教采取解构主义的方法,有时则强调能动性。代理的使用使人们注意到穆斯林在社会、政治和宗教领域的错综复杂,但未能解释政治和经济霸权。这些策略回避了西方政治权力游戏在穆斯林社会和国家中的持续主导地位。因此,我转向流亡的学者,提出他们对批判和伦理的兴趣提供了一种想象伊斯兰世界的不同方式。他们的问题和关注为“后赛义德”伊斯兰研究提供了一个不同的视角。在历史-比较,社会学的术语中,定位和解释,通过超越概念的塑造,允许出现一种人类反身性的突破类型,通常被认为是从神话叙事到理性理性的通道。16
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信