Diversity of Empirical Design - Review of Studies on the Cross-Section of Common Stocks

A. Waszczuk
{"title":"Diversity of Empirical Design - Review of Studies on the Cross-Section of Common Stocks","authors":"A. Waszczuk","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2428054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International studies on the cross-section of returns diff er strongly in respect to the empirical design. In this paper I cover wide range of international papers to give an overview of methodological variations applied by researchers. Construction of stock characteristics and risk mimicking factors underlying the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and three- and four-factor pricing models give authors much degrees of freedom resulting in a wide set of alternative measurement methodologies. Also statistical tests on both cross-section and time-series of returns show methodological differences that might be influential on results and inferences from the analysis. Increasing exploration of international data sets puts new challenges on empirical studies that emerge from market and data characteristics. As a consequence, original methodology applied for U.S. market requires adjustments depending on coverage and scope of the analysis. This paper provides the summary of proposed adjustments and might serve as a starting point for the analysis of international equity data.","PeriodicalId":222637,"journal":{"name":"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Research Paper Series","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2428054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

International studies on the cross-section of returns diff er strongly in respect to the empirical design. In this paper I cover wide range of international papers to give an overview of methodological variations applied by researchers. Construction of stock characteristics and risk mimicking factors underlying the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and three- and four-factor pricing models give authors much degrees of freedom resulting in a wide set of alternative measurement methodologies. Also statistical tests on both cross-section and time-series of returns show methodological differences that might be influential on results and inferences from the analysis. Increasing exploration of international data sets puts new challenges on empirical studies that emerge from market and data characteristics. As a consequence, original methodology applied for U.S. market requires adjustments depending on coverage and scope of the analysis. This paper provides the summary of proposed adjustments and might serve as a starting point for the analysis of international equity data.
实证设计的多样性——普通股横截面研究综述
国际上关于收益截面的研究在实证设计方面存在很大差异。在本文中,我涵盖了广泛的国际论文,以概述研究人员应用的方法变化。资本资产定价模型(CAPM)和三因素和四因素定价模型的股票特征和风险模仿因素的构建给了作者很大的自由度,从而产生了一套广泛的替代测量方法。此外,对收益率的横截面和时间序列进行的统计检验表明,方法上的差异可能会影响分析的结果和推论。对国际数据集的不断探索给市场和数据特征产生的实证研究提出了新的挑战。因此,适用于美国市场的原始方法需要根据分析的覆盖范围和范围进行调整。本文提供了拟议调整的摘要,可以作为分析国际公平数据的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信