A write abortion-based protocol in role-based access control systems

Shigenari Nakamura, Dilawaer Duolikun, T. Enokido, M. Takizawa
{"title":"A write abortion-based protocol in role-based access control systems","authors":"Shigenari Nakamura, Dilawaer Duolikun, T. Enokido, M. Takizawa","doi":"10.1504/ijais.2015.072139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In information systems, data in an object may illegally flow into another object if transactions manipulate the objects. In our previous studies, the read-abortion-based role-based synchronisation (RA-RBS) and object-based synchronisation (RA-OBS) protocols are discussed to prevent illegal information flow in the role-based access control (RBAC) model. Illegal read operations mean read operations which might imply illegal information flow. Here, transactions which issue illegal read operations are aborted. In this paper, we consider a unique object whose data is not allowed to flow to another object. An illegal write is defined to be a write operation which a transaction issues after reading a unique object or illegally reading an object. Each transaction reads objects but is aborted if the transaction illegally writes an object. Two types of write-abortion (WA)-based synchronisation protocols WA-RBS and WA-OBS are discussed based on abortions of transactions issuing illegal write operations. In the evaluation, the number of transactions aborted can be more reduced in the WA protocols than the RA protocols.","PeriodicalId":383612,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Adaptive and Innovative Systems","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Adaptive and Innovative Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijais.2015.072139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

In information systems, data in an object may illegally flow into another object if transactions manipulate the objects. In our previous studies, the read-abortion-based role-based synchronisation (RA-RBS) and object-based synchronisation (RA-OBS) protocols are discussed to prevent illegal information flow in the role-based access control (RBAC) model. Illegal read operations mean read operations which might imply illegal information flow. Here, transactions which issue illegal read operations are aborted. In this paper, we consider a unique object whose data is not allowed to flow to another object. An illegal write is defined to be a write operation which a transaction issues after reading a unique object or illegally reading an object. Each transaction reads objects but is aborted if the transaction illegally writes an object. Two types of write-abortion (WA)-based synchronisation protocols WA-RBS and WA-OBS are discussed based on abortions of transactions issuing illegal write operations. In the evaluation, the number of transactions aborted can be more reduced in the WA protocols than the RA protocols.
基于角色的访问控制系统中基于写终止的协议
在信息系统中,如果事务操作一个对象,则对象中的数据可能非法地流入另一个对象。在我们之前的研究中,讨论了基于读终止的基于角色的同步(RA-RBS)和基于对象的同步(RA-OBS)协议,以防止基于角色的访问控制(RBAC)模型中的非法信息流。非法读操作是指可能导致非法信息流的读操作。在这里,发出非法读操作的事务被中止。在本文中,我们考虑一个唯一对象,其数据不允许流向另一个对象。非法写定义为事务读取唯一对象或非法读取对象后进行的写操作。每个事务读取对象,但如果事务非法写入对象,则终止。基于发出非法写操作的事务的流产,讨论了两种基于写流产(WA)的同步协议WA- rbs和WA- obs。在评估中,WA协议比RA协议更能减少事务中止的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信