Political terror and the right-wing movement (The case of Vladimir Governorate)

Igor' V. Omel'yanchuk
{"title":"Political terror and the right-wing movement (The case of Vladimir Governorate)","authors":"Igor' V. Omel'yanchuk","doi":"10.23859/2587-8344-2021-5-3-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the street confrontation of October 1905 which went down in history as Jewish pogroms. The source base of the work comprises the documents of the police department deposited in the State Archive of Vladimir Oblast and the materials from periodicals of various political leanings. After the publication of the Manifesto of the 17th of October, 1905, in the streets of Russian cities, the revolutionary demonstrations whose participants viewed the Manifesto as a signal for a decisive assault on the autocracy clashed with the patriotic manifestations held by those who wanted to defend their familiar world. The defiant behavior of opposition supporters who preached their political ideals and in doing so insulted national and religious feelings of the conservative strata of population provoked street excesses, which then turned into bloody clashes. The situation was aggravated by the inaction of the local authorities who had not received timely instructions from St Petersburg and showed confusion during the first “days of freedom.” Thus, the pogroms of October 1905 which took place outside the Pale of Settlement were directed not so much against the Jews as against the revolutionaries (a considerable part of them were Jews). Contrary to the idea prevailing in historiography that the clashes of October 1905 were organized, the pogroms arose spontaneously. Neither the government, which was prostrate, nor the right-wing parties, the numerical composition of which in Russia at that time was measured by several thousand people, initiated or organized those events. In October 1905, there were no monarchist organizations in Vladimir Governorate at all. However, the supporters of autocracy are responsible for two political murders which occurred after the pogroms in November–December 1905. In Ivanovo-Voznesensk the crowd infuriated with the events of recent months tore to pieces a revolutionary woman who was transporting weapons, and in the village of Undol workers killed an agitator who called for the overthrow of autocracy. After the foundation of monarchist organizations in Vladimir Governorate, street clashes between the opponents and the supporters of autocracy gradually died down because the monarchists got an opportunity to defend their political convictions in a more civilized form. Although the conflicts between persons of opposite political views continued for some time, they were more like domestic quarrels and had no victims. Both sides were equally responsible for those incidents.","PeriodicalId":250882,"journal":{"name":"Historia provinciae – the journal of regional history","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia provinciae – the journal of regional history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23859/2587-8344-2021-5-3-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the street confrontation of October 1905 which went down in history as Jewish pogroms. The source base of the work comprises the documents of the police department deposited in the State Archive of Vladimir Oblast and the materials from periodicals of various political leanings. After the publication of the Manifesto of the 17th of October, 1905, in the streets of Russian cities, the revolutionary demonstrations whose participants viewed the Manifesto as a signal for a decisive assault on the autocracy clashed with the patriotic manifestations held by those who wanted to defend their familiar world. The defiant behavior of opposition supporters who preached their political ideals and in doing so insulted national and religious feelings of the conservative strata of population provoked street excesses, which then turned into bloody clashes. The situation was aggravated by the inaction of the local authorities who had not received timely instructions from St Petersburg and showed confusion during the first “days of freedom.” Thus, the pogroms of October 1905 which took place outside the Pale of Settlement were directed not so much against the Jews as against the revolutionaries (a considerable part of them were Jews). Contrary to the idea prevailing in historiography that the clashes of October 1905 were organized, the pogroms arose spontaneously. Neither the government, which was prostrate, nor the right-wing parties, the numerical composition of which in Russia at that time was measured by several thousand people, initiated or organized those events. In October 1905, there were no monarchist organizations in Vladimir Governorate at all. However, the supporters of autocracy are responsible for two political murders which occurred after the pogroms in November–December 1905. In Ivanovo-Voznesensk the crowd infuriated with the events of recent months tore to pieces a revolutionary woman who was transporting weapons, and in the village of Undol workers killed an agitator who called for the overthrow of autocracy. After the foundation of monarchist organizations in Vladimir Governorate, street clashes between the opponents and the supporters of autocracy gradually died down because the monarchists got an opportunity to defend their political convictions in a more civilized form. Although the conflicts between persons of opposite political views continued for some time, they were more like domestic quarrels and had no victims. Both sides were equally responsible for those incidents.
政治恐怖和右翼运动(以弗拉基米尔省为例)
这篇文章考察了1905年10月作为犹太人大屠杀而载入史册的街头对抗。作品的来源包括存放在弗拉基米尔州国家档案馆的警察部门的文件和来自各种政治倾向期刊的材料。1905年10月17日《宣言》发表后,在俄国城市的街道上,革命示威的参与者将《宣言》视为对专制政权进行决定性攻击的信号,与那些想要捍卫自己熟悉的世界的人所举行的爱国示威发生了冲突。反对派支持者宣扬他们的政治理想,这样做侮辱了保守阶层的民族和宗教感情,他们的挑衅行为引发了街头骚乱,然后演变成血腥冲突。由于地方当局不采取行动,没有及时收到圣彼得堡的指示,并在最初“自由的日子”中表现出混乱,局势更加恶化。因此,1905年10月发生在定居点外的大屠杀与其说是针对犹太人,不如说是针对革命者(其中相当一部分是犹太人)。与史学界普遍认为的1905年10月的冲突是有组织的观点相反,大屠杀是自发发生的。既不是软弱无力的政府,也不是右翼政党发起或组织了这些事件,当时俄罗斯右翼政党的人数组成是由几千人组成的。1905年10月,弗拉基米尔省根本没有君主主义组织。然而,专制的支持者应对1905年11月至12月大屠杀后发生的两起政治谋杀负责。在伊万诺沃-沃兹涅先斯克,对最近几个月发生的事件感到愤怒的群众把一名运送武器的革命妇女撕成粉碎,在昂多尔村,工人们杀死了一名呼吁推翻独裁统治的鼓动者。在弗拉基米尔省建立君主主义组织后,专制的反对者和支持者之间的街头冲突逐渐平息,因为君主主义者有机会以更文明的形式捍卫他们的政治信念。虽然持相反政治观点的人之间的冲突持续了一段时间,但它们更像是家庭争吵,没有受害者。双方对这些事件负有同等责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信