{"title":"The notion of the arts as “unnatural natural” communication (exemplified by the discourse of drama)","authors":"Е.Г. Логинова","doi":"10.37724/RSU.2020.54.3.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"В статье предпринимается попытка применить ряд положений когнитивной поэтики, семиотики \nи лингвистики к традиционным вопросам филологического анализа литературно-художественного дискурса, взятого как пример художественной коммуникации. Обосновывая понятие «неестественной естественности» художественной коммуникации, автор обращается к инструменту, способному обеспечить иной уровень анализа художественного дискурса, включающего исходный и трансформированный тексты (пьесу и ее сценическую интерпретацию), когда изучение смыслоформирования в едином коммуникативном пространстве происходит с учетом параллелизма форм, значений и прагматических установок говорящих.\n The article attempts to apply a number of provisions of cognitive poetics, semiotics and linguistics to the traditional philological analysis of literary works. Justifying the concept of the arts as “unnatural natural” communication (including literary works, theatrical performances, screen adaptions, paintings, etc.), the author relies on the key assumptions expressed in the works by Yu. Lotman, U. Eco, R. Barthes, R. Jacobson, T. van Dijk, M. Freeman and other scholars: “the second (modeling) system”; “literary pragmatics”; “oriented toward the expressive, the emotive and the aesthetic”; etc.\nThe heterogeneous discourse of drama is used to exemplify the theoretical assumptions and so helps to grasp the idea of the arts as “unnatural natural” communication. Moreover, the author of the article speaks of semiotic resonance as a tool that can help to deepen the analysis of the meaning construction in the discourse of drama. Being a multifaceted phenomenon, semiotic resonance provides new perspectives for the analysis of the discourse of drama, when the study of the aesthetic effect of the communicative space as a whole takes into account the parallelism of forms, meanings and pragmatic attitudes of the characters in the original communicative situation and further communicative situations.","PeriodicalId":264518,"journal":{"name":"Иностранные языки в высшей школе","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Иностранные языки в высшей школе","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37724/RSU.2020.54.3.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
В статье предпринимается попытка применить ряд положений когнитивной поэтики, семиотики
и лингвистики к традиционным вопросам филологического анализа литературно-художественного дискурса, взятого как пример художественной коммуникации. Обосновывая понятие «неестественной естественности» художественной коммуникации, автор обращается к инструменту, способному обеспечить иной уровень анализа художественного дискурса, включающего исходный и трансформированный тексты (пьесу и ее сценическую интерпретацию), когда изучение смыслоформирования в едином коммуникативном пространстве происходит с учетом параллелизма форм, значений и прагматических установок говорящих.
The article attempts to apply a number of provisions of cognitive poetics, semiotics and linguistics to the traditional philological analysis of literary works. Justifying the concept of the arts as “unnatural natural” communication (including literary works, theatrical performances, screen adaptions, paintings, etc.), the author relies on the key assumptions expressed in the works by Yu. Lotman, U. Eco, R. Barthes, R. Jacobson, T. van Dijk, M. Freeman and other scholars: “the second (modeling) system”; “literary pragmatics”; “oriented toward the expressive, the emotive and the aesthetic”; etc.
The heterogeneous discourse of drama is used to exemplify the theoretical assumptions and so helps to grasp the idea of the arts as “unnatural natural” communication. Moreover, the author of the article speaks of semiotic resonance as a tool that can help to deepen the analysis of the meaning construction in the discourse of drama. Being a multifaceted phenomenon, semiotic resonance provides new perspectives for the analysis of the discourse of drama, when the study of the aesthetic effect of the communicative space as a whole takes into account the parallelism of forms, meanings and pragmatic attitudes of the characters in the original communicative situation and further communicative situations.
这篇文章试图将认知诗歌、符号学和语言学的一些条款应用到文献分析的传统问题上,例如艺术交流。在解释艺术交流的“非自然”概念时,作者求助于一种能够提供不同程度的艺术话语分析的工具,其中包括原始和变换的文本(剧本和舞台解释),当研究单一通信空间中的意义与说话者的形式、意义和实用安排并行发生时。在英语中,英语是英语中最重要的语言,也是英语中最重要的语言。《艺术协奏曲》、《非自然》、《戏剧表演》、《尖叫adaptions》、《素描》、《等等》、《艺术协奏曲》。Lotman, e . Barthes, R. barthson, T. van Dijk, T. van Dijk, m。“文学pragmatics”;“对快车、情感和aesthetic的初步奖励;”《戏剧》中的情节分裂是为了帮助艺术交流,帮助艺术交流。Moreover,《艺术之矛》的监督者,是唯一能帮助我们解决戏剧问题的人。a multifaceted》《谐振provides new semiotic政界for the analysis of the discourse of drama, when the研究教学法of the aesthetic effect of the space as a whole takes into the并行of窗体,meanings帐户and实用attitudes of the性格in the original情境教学法and继续教学法situations。