Applying conversational thinking to the problem of xenophobia in multicultural societies

L. Ogbonnaya
{"title":"Applying conversational thinking to the problem of xenophobia in multicultural societies","authors":"L. Ogbonnaya","doi":"10.4314/ajct.v1i1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multicultural societies are faced with the problem of xenophobia – the fear, dislike, and discrimination against strangers. Xenophobia has its root in the ontology of ‘the self’ and ‘the other’, where ‘the self’” is ‘the indigenes’ and ‘the other,’ ‘the strangers’, who must be denied the privileges and rights of the indigenes and the opportunity to contribute towards the development of their societies. In this paper, I employ conversational thinking – a method and philosophy grounded in the sub-Saharan African notion of ‘relationship’ as a viable theoretical option that can help us live beyond the problem of xenophobia. In conversational thinking, there are two ontological and epistemic agents, nwa-nsa and nwa-nju, involved in an arumaristic relationship at an ontological point, nwa-izugbe. I ground my argument in this ‘arumaristic relationship’ which allows for nwa-nsa taken as ‘the self’ (indigenes) and nwa-nju, ‘the other’ (strangers) to come to the realm of nwa-izugbe, and exhibit nmeko (complementarity and solidarity). I contend that the notion ‘nmeko’, emphasized in conversational thinking, is key to putting xenophobia in the past since it stresses ‘arumaristic complementary relationship’ irrespective of socio-cultural and racial differences among people.","PeriodicalId":141056,"journal":{"name":"Arụmarụka: Journal of Conversational Thinking","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arụmarụka: Journal of Conversational Thinking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ajct.v1i1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multicultural societies are faced with the problem of xenophobia – the fear, dislike, and discrimination against strangers. Xenophobia has its root in the ontology of ‘the self’ and ‘the other’, where ‘the self’” is ‘the indigenes’ and ‘the other,’ ‘the strangers’, who must be denied the privileges and rights of the indigenes and the opportunity to contribute towards the development of their societies. In this paper, I employ conversational thinking – a method and philosophy grounded in the sub-Saharan African notion of ‘relationship’ as a viable theoretical option that can help us live beyond the problem of xenophobia. In conversational thinking, there are two ontological and epistemic agents, nwa-nsa and nwa-nju, involved in an arumaristic relationship at an ontological point, nwa-izugbe. I ground my argument in this ‘arumaristic relationship’ which allows for nwa-nsa taken as ‘the self’ (indigenes) and nwa-nju, ‘the other’ (strangers) to come to the realm of nwa-izugbe, and exhibit nmeko (complementarity and solidarity). I contend that the notion ‘nmeko’, emphasized in conversational thinking, is key to putting xenophobia in the past since it stresses ‘arumaristic complementary relationship’ irrespective of socio-cultural and racial differences among people.
将对话思维应用于多元文化社会中的仇外心理问题
多元文化社会面临着仇外心理的问题,即对陌生人的恐惧、厌恶和歧视。仇外心理的根源在于“自我”和“他者”的本体论,其中“自我”是“土著人”和“他者”,是“陌生人”,他们必须被剥夺土著人的特权和权利以及为其社会发展作出贡献的机会。在本文中,我采用对话思维——一种基于撒哈拉以南非洲“关系”概念的方法和哲学,作为一种可行的理论选择,可以帮助我们超越仇外心理问题。在会话思维中,有两个本体论和认知的主体,nwa-nsa和nwa-nju,在一个本体论点nwa-izugbe上参与了一种客观关系。我的论点建立在这种“arumaristic relationship”的基础上,这种关系允许nwa-nsa被视为“自我”(土著)和nwa-nju,“他者”(陌生人)来到nwa-izugbe的领域,并表现出nmeko(互补性和团结性)。我认为,对话思维中强调的“nmeko”概念是将仇外心理置于过去的关键,因为它强调的是“人道主义的互补关系”,而不考虑人们之间的社会文化和种族差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信