Parallel Paths to Local Democracy in Asia

Brian Wampler, Stephanie L. McNulty, Michael Touchton
{"title":"Parallel Paths to Local Democracy in Asia","authors":"Brian Wampler, Stephanie L. McNulty, Michael Touchton","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192897756.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extensive experimentation with new democratic institutions took place in Asia across the 1980s and 1990s, but PB only formally arrived at the beginning of the twenty-first century. The spread of PB across Asia thus stems from democratic impulses to empower citizens in new democracies. This chapter focuses on three countries—South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia—to illuminate key trends in the region. The chapter shows that a small number of local governments initially adopted “PB-like” programs. Positive evaluations of these programs then spurred national governments to mandate PB to incorporate large segments of the population in public decision-making. An additional focus, toward the end of this chapter, is the expansion of PB to China because it helps to illuminate how the malleability of PB’s rules enables local governments to implement the program in authoritarian contexts; the use of PB by authoritarian governments is one of the most controversial issues facing PB today. The cases from Asia reviewed in this chapter offer the promise of social and political change. However, the limitations on evidence means that enough information about these programs’ specific impacts is still lacking.","PeriodicalId":314567,"journal":{"name":"Participatory Budgeting in Global Perspective","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Participatory Budgeting in Global Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192897756.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive experimentation with new democratic institutions took place in Asia across the 1980s and 1990s, but PB only formally arrived at the beginning of the twenty-first century. The spread of PB across Asia thus stems from democratic impulses to empower citizens in new democracies. This chapter focuses on three countries—South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia—to illuminate key trends in the region. The chapter shows that a small number of local governments initially adopted “PB-like” programs. Positive evaluations of these programs then spurred national governments to mandate PB to incorporate large segments of the population in public decision-making. An additional focus, toward the end of this chapter, is the expansion of PB to China because it helps to illuminate how the malleability of PB’s rules enables local governments to implement the program in authoritarian contexts; the use of PB by authoritarian governments is one of the most controversial issues facing PB today. The cases from Asia reviewed in this chapter offer the promise of social and political change. However, the limitations on evidence means that enough information about these programs’ specific impacts is still lacking.
亚洲地方民主的平行路径
在20世纪80年代和90年代,亚洲对新的民主制度进行了广泛的试验,但民主制度直到21世纪初才正式出现。因此,PB在亚洲的传播源于新兴民主国家赋予公民权力的民主冲动。本章以韩国、菲律宾和印度尼西亚这三个国家为重点,阐明该地区的主要趋势。本章显示,少数地方政府最初采用了“类似pb”的方案。对这些项目的积极评价促使各国政府授权PB将大部分人口纳入公共决策。本章末尾的另一个重点是将PB扩展到中国,因为它有助于阐明PB规则的可延展性如何使地方政府能够在专制背景下实施该计划;专制政府对PB的使用是当今PB面临的最具争议的问题之一。本章回顾的亚洲案例为社会和政治变革提供了希望。然而,证据的局限性意味着关于这些项目具体影响的足够信息仍然缺乏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信