L. Hayes, Brad A. Dufrene, Crystal N. Taylor, D. J. Olmi, Leonard C. W. Troughton, Evan H. Dart, Cai Weaver
{"title":"The Effect of Token Economies on Student Behavior in the Preschool Classroom: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"L. Hayes, Brad A. Dufrene, Crystal N. Taylor, D. J. Olmi, Leonard C. W. Troughton, Evan H. Dart, Cai Weaver","doi":"10.58948/2834-8257.1034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been a recent push in the literature to identify and use more evidence-based practices for positive behavioral supports for challenging student behaviors in the classroom environment. Further, interest in targeting early education environments such as preschool has been growing given the persistence of behavioral difficulties in the absence of early and effective intervention (Campbell & Ewing, 1990; Kazdin, 1987; Powell et al., 2006; Stormont, 2002). Two previous meta-analyses (Maggin et al., 2011; Soares et al., 2016) provided some initial support for effectiveness of token economies with challenging student behavior; however, the inclusion of the preschool setting was limited and both studies used older versions of design standards to evaluate the quality of studies in the literature. The present study served to extend those meta-analyses by targeting preschool classrooms. Further, the current study included the most recent What Works Clearinghouse Design Standards to evaluate whether token economies meet criteria as an evidence-based practice. Ten studies were included in the final analyses. Two sets of effect sizes were calculated: Baseline-Corrected Tau and Hedge’s g. An omnibus effect size showed an overall large effect; however, similar to previous meta-analyses, several methodological concerns were identified. Moderator analyses for several variables were conducted; however, no moderator analyses were significant. Limitations and future directions were discussed.","PeriodicalId":355462,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Early Childhood Psychology and Education","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Early Childhood Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58948/2834-8257.1034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There has been a recent push in the literature to identify and use more evidence-based practices for positive behavioral supports for challenging student behaviors in the classroom environment. Further, interest in targeting early education environments such as preschool has been growing given the persistence of behavioral difficulties in the absence of early and effective intervention (Campbell & Ewing, 1990; Kazdin, 1987; Powell et al., 2006; Stormont, 2002). Two previous meta-analyses (Maggin et al., 2011; Soares et al., 2016) provided some initial support for effectiveness of token economies with challenging student behavior; however, the inclusion of the preschool setting was limited and both studies used older versions of design standards to evaluate the quality of studies in the literature. The present study served to extend those meta-analyses by targeting preschool classrooms. Further, the current study included the most recent What Works Clearinghouse Design Standards to evaluate whether token economies meet criteria as an evidence-based practice. Ten studies were included in the final analyses. Two sets of effect sizes were calculated: Baseline-Corrected Tau and Hedge’s g. An omnibus effect size showed an overall large effect; however, similar to previous meta-analyses, several methodological concerns were identified. Moderator analyses for several variables were conducted; however, no moderator analyses were significant. Limitations and future directions were discussed.
最近在文献中有一种推动,即确定和使用更多基于证据的实践来支持积极的行为,以挑战课堂环境中的学生行为。此外,鉴于在缺乏早期有效干预的情况下行为困难的持续存在,针对学前教育等早期教育环境的兴趣正在增长(Campbell & Ewing, 1990;卡兹丁,1987;Powell et al., 2006;斯托蒙特,2002)。之前的两项荟萃分析(Maggin et al., 2011;Soares等人,2016)为具有挑战性的学生行为的代币经济的有效性提供了一些初步支持;然而,纳入学前环境是有限的,两项研究都使用旧版本的设计标准来评估文献中研究的质量。本研究旨在扩展这些荟萃分析,以学龄前教室为研究对象。此外,目前的研究包括最新的What Works Clearinghouse设计标准,以评估代币经济是否符合以证据为基础的实践标准。在最后的分析中纳入了10项研究。计算了两组效应量:基线校正的Tau和Hedge 's g。综合效应量显示整体效应大;然而,与之前的荟萃分析类似,我们确定了几个方法学问题。对几个变量进行了调节分析;然而,没有调节分析是显著的。讨论了局限性和未来发展方向。