Developing Information Quality Model and Measuring Information Quality for Further Improvement: A Case of ERP System of a State Owned Company

Nur Fitriah Ayuning Budi, A. Hidayanto, P. Sandhyaduhita, Theresia Wati
{"title":"Developing Information Quality Model and Measuring Information Quality for Further Improvement: A Case of ERP System of a State Owned Company","authors":"Nur Fitriah Ayuning Budi, A. Hidayanto, P. Sandhyaduhita, Theresia Wati","doi":"10.1109/ICCED.2018.00019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information quality (IQ) has received considerable attention in various sectors due to its critical impact on the accuracy of decision-making process. Many organizations are aware of having problems with their information quality, but often facing difficulty to measure IQ capability. This study aims to develop a model that will be used to measure information quality by adopting PSP/IQ Model. Data was collected through focus group discussion and internal survey. IQ model development was carried out by using Analytical Hierarchy Process methodology. The final model concludes the priority of IQ aspects is in the same level priority with the same weighted score of 0,25. Furthermore, three dimensions that have the highest priority are consecutively security (0.188), free-of-error (0.137), and reputation (0.112). The result of information quality measurement shows that relevancy (3,29) has the highest satisfaction score among others. Finally, gap analysis was discussed to propose further improvement priority of the IQ dimension.","PeriodicalId":166437,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Computing, Engineering, and Design (ICCED)","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Computing, Engineering, and Design (ICCED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCED.2018.00019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Information quality (IQ) has received considerable attention in various sectors due to its critical impact on the accuracy of decision-making process. Many organizations are aware of having problems with their information quality, but often facing difficulty to measure IQ capability. This study aims to develop a model that will be used to measure information quality by adopting PSP/IQ Model. Data was collected through focus group discussion and internal survey. IQ model development was carried out by using Analytical Hierarchy Process methodology. The final model concludes the priority of IQ aspects is in the same level priority with the same weighted score of 0,25. Furthermore, three dimensions that have the highest priority are consecutively security (0.188), free-of-error (0.137), and reputation (0.112). The result of information quality measurement shows that relevancy (3,29) has the highest satisfaction score among others. Finally, gap analysis was discussed to propose further improvement priority of the IQ dimension.
建立信息质量模型并对信息质量进行测度以促进改进——以某国有企业ERP系统为例
信息质量(IQ)由于对决策过程的准确性有重要影响,在各个部门受到了相当大的关注。许多组织都意识到他们的信息质量存在问题,但往往面临测量智商能力的困难。本研究旨在建立一个以PSP/IQ模型来衡量资讯品质的模型。通过焦点小组讨论和内部调查收集数据。采用层次分析法进行了IQ模型的开发。最终模型得出智商各方面的优先级为相同的水平优先级,加权分数为0,25。此外,具有最高优先级的三个维度依次是安全性(0.188)、无错误率(0.137)和声誉(0.112)。信息质量测量结果显示,相关性(3,29)的满意度得分最高。最后,对IQ维度进行了差距分析,提出了进一步改进的优先级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信