Perception analysis of students' level of understanding in statistics course

A. Diputera
{"title":"Perception analysis of students' level of understanding in statistics course","authors":"A. Diputera","doi":"10.24114/jmns.v1i2.33217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statistical courses are mandatory for students to take to assist in solving research problems. The purpose of this study was to determine student perceptions of the level of understanding of all statistical material indicators after attending statistics lectures and to prove that the average student perception was not in the low category. The research method used is quantitative research. The sample used was 31 samples from students of Early Childhood Education Teacher Education, Universitas Negeri Medan in 2021. The data collection technique used a questionnaire technique. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and one sample t-test. The results showed that Student perceptions of mastery of statistical lecture indicators fall into two categories, namely the high category of 61% and the medium category of 39%. The perception of the sample's ability to master the lecture indicators is divided into four categories, namely the very high category of 19%, the high category of 42%, the medium category of 32%, and the low category of 7%. The mean score of perceived mastery of statistical indicators is greater than 31.5, which means that students' perceptions of ability are not in the Low category.  ","PeriodicalId":151504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics and Natural Sciences","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics and Natural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24114/jmns.v1i2.33217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statistical courses are mandatory for students to take to assist in solving research problems. The purpose of this study was to determine student perceptions of the level of understanding of all statistical material indicators after attending statistics lectures and to prove that the average student perception was not in the low category. The research method used is quantitative research. The sample used was 31 samples from students of Early Childhood Education Teacher Education, Universitas Negeri Medan in 2021. The data collection technique used a questionnaire technique. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and one sample t-test. The results showed that Student perceptions of mastery of statistical lecture indicators fall into two categories, namely the high category of 61% and the medium category of 39%. The perception of the sample's ability to master the lecture indicators is divided into four categories, namely the very high category of 19%, the high category of 42%, the medium category of 32%, and the low category of 7%. The mean score of perceived mastery of statistical indicators is greater than 31.5, which means that students' perceptions of ability are not in the Low category.  
统计课学生理解水平的感知分析
为了帮助学生解决研究问题,统计学课程是必修课程。本研究的目的是确定学生在参加统计学讲座后对所有统计材料指标的理解水平的感知,并证明学生的平均感知不属于低类别。使用的研究方法是定量研究。使用的样本是2021年尼日利亚棉兰大学幼儿教育教师教育专业学生的31个样本。数据收集技术采用问卷调查技术。数据分析采用描述性统计和单样本t检验。结果表明,学生对统计讲座指标掌握程度的感知分为两类,高类别为61%,中等类别为39%。样本对讲课指标掌握能力的感知分为四类,即非常高的19%,高的42%,中等的32%,低的7%。对统计指标感知掌握的平均得分大于31.5,说明学生对能力的感知不在Low范畴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信