{"title":"Local Knowledge and “Other Anthropologies” [Lokal’noe znanie i “drugie antropologii”]","authors":"D. Baranov, D. Arzyutov, Stanislav Petriashin","doi":"10.31857/s086954150017416-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the problems of ethnographic description and representation of the culture of Others and analyzes the ontological limitations inherent in anthropology, which call into question the very possibility of obtaining objective knowledge about the studied cultures. The concept of “other anthropologies” is proposed, which implies the recognition of heuristically significant alternatives to the Eurocentric perspective in the descriptions and interpretations of cultures. Such an approach, which is based on the ideas of E. Viveiroz de Castro, raises the following questions: what can we, ethnographers, be taught in a theoretical and ideological sense by acquaintance with the cultures that are the subject of research? what is the contribution of different cultures to the production of new disciplinary concepts and theories? to what extent are we ready to recognize and include “folk” knowledge “on equal terms” in our scientific discourse?","PeriodicalId":374535,"journal":{"name":"Etnograficheskoe obozrenie","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etnograficheskoe obozrenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s086954150017416-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article examines the problems of ethnographic description and representation of the culture of Others and analyzes the ontological limitations inherent in anthropology, which call into question the very possibility of obtaining objective knowledge about the studied cultures. The concept of “other anthropologies” is proposed, which implies the recognition of heuristically significant alternatives to the Eurocentric perspective in the descriptions and interpretations of cultures. Such an approach, which is based on the ideas of E. Viveiroz de Castro, raises the following questions: what can we, ethnographers, be taught in a theoretical and ideological sense by acquaintance with the cultures that are the subject of research? what is the contribution of different cultures to the production of new disciplinary concepts and theories? to what extent are we ready to recognize and include “folk” knowledge “on equal terms” in our scientific discourse?
本文考察了民族志对他者文化的描述和表征的问题,并分析了人类学固有的本体论局限性,这些局限性使人们对获得关于所研究文化的客观知识的可能性产生了疑问。提出了“其他人类学”的概念,这意味着承认在描述和解释文化时,欧洲中心视角的启发式重要替代方案。这种基于E. Viveiroz de Castro思想的方法提出了以下问题:通过对作为研究主题的文化的了解,我们这些民族志学者在理论和意识形态意义上能学到什么?不同的文化对新的学科概念和理论的产生有什么贡献?我们准备在多大程度上承认并将“民间”知识“平等地”纳入我们的科学论述?