An Integrated Approach of CO2 Injection and Storage Assessment in Tight Gas Condensate Carbonate Reservoir, Case Study: Central Kalimantan, Indonesia

A. Magfirah
{"title":"An Integrated Approach of CO2 Injection and Storage Assessment in Tight Gas Condensate Carbonate Reservoir, Case Study: Central Kalimantan, Indonesia","authors":"A. Magfirah","doi":"10.29118/ipa22-se-306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geological storage is a potential solution for storing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from stationary sources such as fossil-fuel-fired power stations over lengthy periods. The typical geological formation for storage is a massive saline aquifer or oil and gas reservoir with good permeability (>100 mD). However, what if the targeted geological formation is a massive reservoir with tight properties (<0.1 mD)? Does it have the potential to store CO2? Currently, the study of CO2 storage in a tight reservoir is limited. Therefore, this study presents a comprehensive subsurface analysis of CO2 storage potential in a tight gas condensate carbonate reservoir located in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. The study analyzes the characteristics of CO2 injection and storage in tight formation, which covers the entire GGR (geology, geophysics, reservoir) aspects. The reservoir is a platform carbonate and based on the geoscience assessment the reservoir can be clustered into several depositional elements (DE), such as reef complex and platform interior. A static & dynamic model is created to capture the reservoir behavior, variations, and physics. As such, it is utilized to assess the field's effective storage capacity, reservoir injectivity, CO2 plume migration, pressure connection potential, CO2 breakthrough phenomena, and stimulation effectiveness. Additionally, coupled reservoir-geomechanical models are also performed to assess the relevant geomechanical concerns upon three separate phases of pre-injection, during injection, and after injection/monitoring. Initially, a well-calibrated 3D compositional reservoir model is prepared for performing a series of CO2 injection scenarios. It is started by performing a well-by-well assessment and continued by a full-field assessment. Firstly, the sensitivity of well locations indicates that the reef complex has higher injectivity five times compared to the platform interior. However, the CO2 injected into the reef complex also has a quicker breakthrough to the producer wells than the other DE-s. Moreover, the streamline analysis confirms this finding by showing distinct features of pressure path and flow behavior. Subsequently, the sensitivity of well stimulation treatment is also performed. The wells with acid fracturing stimulation can deliver double the injectivity of untreated wells. As for the full-field assessment, the coupled reservoir-geomechanical model is calibrated by a series of rock mechanic tests (triaxial, uni-axial pore volume compressibility, and permeability under a series of confining stresses). These tests indicate that the reservoir consists of hard rock (>3 million psi Young’s Modulus) and behaves as an intact structure until the end of the injection period. Overall, this study of CO2 Injection and Storage in a tight gas reservoir shows that this formation has the potential to store the CO2. Neither injectivity issues nor geomechanical risks are forecasted for the optimized injection. Finally, the coupled reservoir-geomechanical model also shows that the case study reservoir is intact and can sustain the stresses until the end of the injection period.","PeriodicalId":442360,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Indonesian Petroleum Association, 46th Annual Convention &amp; Exhibition, 2022","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Indonesian Petroleum Association, 46th Annual Convention &amp; Exhibition, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29118/ipa22-se-306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geological storage is a potential solution for storing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from stationary sources such as fossil-fuel-fired power stations over lengthy periods. The typical geological formation for storage is a massive saline aquifer or oil and gas reservoir with good permeability (>100 mD). However, what if the targeted geological formation is a massive reservoir with tight properties (<0.1 mD)? Does it have the potential to store CO2? Currently, the study of CO2 storage in a tight reservoir is limited. Therefore, this study presents a comprehensive subsurface analysis of CO2 storage potential in a tight gas condensate carbonate reservoir located in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. The study analyzes the characteristics of CO2 injection and storage in tight formation, which covers the entire GGR (geology, geophysics, reservoir) aspects. The reservoir is a platform carbonate and based on the geoscience assessment the reservoir can be clustered into several depositional elements (DE), such as reef complex and platform interior. A static & dynamic model is created to capture the reservoir behavior, variations, and physics. As such, it is utilized to assess the field's effective storage capacity, reservoir injectivity, CO2 plume migration, pressure connection potential, CO2 breakthrough phenomena, and stimulation effectiveness. Additionally, coupled reservoir-geomechanical models are also performed to assess the relevant geomechanical concerns upon three separate phases of pre-injection, during injection, and after injection/monitoring. Initially, a well-calibrated 3D compositional reservoir model is prepared for performing a series of CO2 injection scenarios. It is started by performing a well-by-well assessment and continued by a full-field assessment. Firstly, the sensitivity of well locations indicates that the reef complex has higher injectivity five times compared to the platform interior. However, the CO2 injected into the reef complex also has a quicker breakthrough to the producer wells than the other DE-s. Moreover, the streamline analysis confirms this finding by showing distinct features of pressure path and flow behavior. Subsequently, the sensitivity of well stimulation treatment is also performed. The wells with acid fracturing stimulation can deliver double the injectivity of untreated wells. As for the full-field assessment, the coupled reservoir-geomechanical model is calibrated by a series of rock mechanic tests (triaxial, uni-axial pore volume compressibility, and permeability under a series of confining stresses). These tests indicate that the reservoir consists of hard rock (>3 million psi Young’s Modulus) and behaves as an intact structure until the end of the injection period. Overall, this study of CO2 Injection and Storage in a tight gas reservoir shows that this formation has the potential to store the CO2. Neither injectivity issues nor geomechanical risks are forecasted for the optimized injection. Finally, the coupled reservoir-geomechanical model also shows that the case study reservoir is intact and can sustain the stresses until the end of the injection period.
致密凝析碳酸盐岩储层CO2注入与封存综合评价方法,以印度尼西亚加里曼丹中部为例
地质储存是长期储存固定来源(如化石燃料发电站)排放的二氧化碳(CO2)的潜在解决方案。典型的储层为大块含盐含水层或渗透率>100 mD的油气储层。然而,如果目标地质层是致密性(300万psi杨氏模量)的大型储层,并且在注入期结束前表现为完整的结构,该怎么办?总的来说,致密气藏的二氧化碳注入与封存研究表明,该地层具有封存二氧化碳的潜力。对于优化后的注入,既没有预测注入能力问题,也没有预测地质力学风险。最后,油藏-地质力学耦合模型也表明,案例油藏是完整的,可以承受应力直到注入期结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信