Roadmap to Gridlock: The Failure of Long-Range Metropolitan Transportation Planning

R. O'toole
{"title":"Roadmap to Gridlock: The Failure of Long-Range Metropolitan Transportation Planning","authors":"R. O'toole","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1291783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Federal law requires metropolitan planning organizations in urban areas of more than 50,000 people to write long-range (20- to 30-year) metropolitan transportation plans and to revise or update those plans every 4 to 5 years. A review of plans for more than 75 of the nation's largest metropolitan areas reveals that virtually all of them fail to follow standard planning methods. As a result, taxpayers and travelers have little assurance that the plans make effective use of available resources to reduce congestion, maximize mobility, and provide safe transportation facilities. Nearly half the plans reviewed here are not cost effective in meeting transportation goals. These plans rely heavily on behavioral tools such as land-use regulation, subsidies to dense or mixed-use developments, and construction of expensive rail transit lines. Nearly 40 years of experience with such tools has shown that they are expensive but provide negligible transportation benefits. Long-range transportation planning necessarily depends on uncertain forecasts. Planners also set qualitative goals such as \"vibrant communities\" and quantifiable but incomparable goals such as \"protecting historic resources.\" Such vagaries result in a politicized process that cannot hope to find the most effective transportation solutions. Thus, long-range planning has contributed to, rather than prevented, the hextupling of congestion American urban areas have suffered since 1982. Ideally, the federal government should not be in the business of funding local transportation and dictating local transportation policies. At the least, Congress should repeal long-range transportation planning requirements in the next reauthorization of federal surface transportation funding. Instead, metropolitan transportation organizations should focus planning on the short term (5 years), and concentrate on quantifiable factors that are directly related to transportation, including safety and congestion relief.","PeriodicalId":125020,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Legislatures eJournal","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Institutions: Legislatures eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1291783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Federal law requires metropolitan planning organizations in urban areas of more than 50,000 people to write long-range (20- to 30-year) metropolitan transportation plans and to revise or update those plans every 4 to 5 years. A review of plans for more than 75 of the nation's largest metropolitan areas reveals that virtually all of them fail to follow standard planning methods. As a result, taxpayers and travelers have little assurance that the plans make effective use of available resources to reduce congestion, maximize mobility, and provide safe transportation facilities. Nearly half the plans reviewed here are not cost effective in meeting transportation goals. These plans rely heavily on behavioral tools such as land-use regulation, subsidies to dense or mixed-use developments, and construction of expensive rail transit lines. Nearly 40 years of experience with such tools has shown that they are expensive but provide negligible transportation benefits. Long-range transportation planning necessarily depends on uncertain forecasts. Planners also set qualitative goals such as "vibrant communities" and quantifiable but incomparable goals such as "protecting historic resources." Such vagaries result in a politicized process that cannot hope to find the most effective transportation solutions. Thus, long-range planning has contributed to, rather than prevented, the hextupling of congestion American urban areas have suffered since 1982. Ideally, the federal government should not be in the business of funding local transportation and dictating local transportation policies. At the least, Congress should repeal long-range transportation planning requirements in the next reauthorization of federal surface transportation funding. Instead, metropolitan transportation organizations should focus planning on the short term (5 years), and concentrate on quantifiable factors that are directly related to transportation, including safety and congestion relief.
交通堵塞路线图:长期都市交通规划的失败
联邦法律要求人口超过5万人的城市规划组织编写长期(20至30年)的城市交通规划,并每4至5年修订或更新这些规划。一项对超过75个全国最大都市地区规划的审查显示,几乎所有这些城市都没有遵循标准的规划方法。因此,纳税人和旅行者很难确信这些计划有效地利用了现有资源,以减少拥堵,最大限度地提高流动性,并提供安全的交通设施。这里审查的近一半的计划在实现交通目标方面没有成本效益。这些计划严重依赖行为工具,如土地使用监管、对密集或混合用途开发项目的补贴,以及建设昂贵的轨道交通线路。近40年来使用此类工具的经验表明,它们价格昂贵,但提供的运输效益微不足道。长期的交通规划必然依赖于不确定的预测。规划者还设定了定性目标,如“充满活力的社区”,以及可量化但无法比拟的目标,如“保护历史资源”。这种不确定性导致了一个政治化的过程,无法指望找到最有效的交通解决方案。因此,自1982年以来,美国城市地区的拥堵程度翻了六倍,长期规划非但没有阻止,反而加剧了拥堵。理想情况下,联邦政府不应该参与资助地方交通和规定地方交通政策的事务。至少,国会应该在下次重新授权联邦地面交通资金时废除长期交通规划要求。相反,大都市交通组织应该将规划重点放在短期(5年),并将重点放在与交通直接相关的可量化因素上,包括安全和缓解拥堵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信