Augmenting Forest Sustainability Certificates with Fiscal Instruments

D. Heine, M. Faure, Chih-Ching Lan
{"title":"Augmenting Forest Sustainability Certificates with Fiscal Instruments","authors":"D. Heine, M. Faure, Chih-Ching Lan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2617815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many developed countries have the declared objective of supporting forest sustainability around the globe, but the world’s most important forests are, in fact, outside their jurisdictions. Actions to protect these forests are therefore constrained by the legal problem of extraterritoriality. To legally act outside their borders, developed countries have supported voluntary certificates on production practices and price-based instruments, but, unfortunately, neither instrument reached beyond niche market shares, administration and compliance costs were high, the environmental gains variable, and the two types of instruments work alongside each other without much synergies.In this paper, we use a Law and Economics methodology to develop a mechanism design that integrates forestry certificates with price-based instruments, in a way that exploits synergies, and provides dynamic incentives for sustainable use of forests while keeping down the costs of compliance and administration. It is a mechanism that satisfies legal extraterritoriality constraints while nevertheless allowing countries to act outside their borders. The mechanism consists of a tax imposed by a timber-importing country on a default assumption regarding the sustainability of the timber, combined with a tax discount that is provided on proof that the sustainability was higher than assumed. The proof is established by showing a sustainability certificate to the customs authority when the timber is imported.This Feebate mechanism reduces a range of standard problems in the literatures on certification and taxation of overseas forestry, such as the problems of threshold costs, free-riding and consumer recognition in markets with competing sustainability certificates, and the problem to compute efficient Pigouvian tax rates in a sector marked by data unavailability. We show that a combination of price-based instruments with certificates can lead to greater sustainability of timber production than each of the instruments alone, without infringing the sovereignty of nations in the South in an extraterritorial manner.","PeriodicalId":296234,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Sustainable Development (Topic)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Sustainable Development (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2617815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Many developed countries have the declared objective of supporting forest sustainability around the globe, but the world’s most important forests are, in fact, outside their jurisdictions. Actions to protect these forests are therefore constrained by the legal problem of extraterritoriality. To legally act outside their borders, developed countries have supported voluntary certificates on production practices and price-based instruments, but, unfortunately, neither instrument reached beyond niche market shares, administration and compliance costs were high, the environmental gains variable, and the two types of instruments work alongside each other without much synergies.In this paper, we use a Law and Economics methodology to develop a mechanism design that integrates forestry certificates with price-based instruments, in a way that exploits synergies, and provides dynamic incentives for sustainable use of forests while keeping down the costs of compliance and administration. It is a mechanism that satisfies legal extraterritoriality constraints while nevertheless allowing countries to act outside their borders. The mechanism consists of a tax imposed by a timber-importing country on a default assumption regarding the sustainability of the timber, combined with a tax discount that is provided on proof that the sustainability was higher than assumed. The proof is established by showing a sustainability certificate to the customs authority when the timber is imported.This Feebate mechanism reduces a range of standard problems in the literatures on certification and taxation of overseas forestry, such as the problems of threshold costs, free-riding and consumer recognition in markets with competing sustainability certificates, and the problem to compute efficient Pigouvian tax rates in a sector marked by data unavailability. We show that a combination of price-based instruments with certificates can lead to greater sustainability of timber production than each of the instruments alone, without infringing the sovereignty of nations in the South in an extraterritorial manner.
利用财政手段扩大森林可持续性证书
许多发达国家都宣称要支持全球森林的可持续性,但事实上,世界上最重要的森林不在它们的管辖范围之内。因此,保护这些森林的行动受到治外法权的法律问题的限制。为了在境外合法行动,发达国家支持生产实践自愿证书和基于价格的工具,但不幸的是,这两种工具都没有超出利基市场份额,管理和合规成本高,环境收益不稳定,两种工具相互配合,没有多少协同作用。在本文中,我们使用法律和经济学方法开发了一种机制设计,将林业证书与基于价格的工具结合起来,以一种利用协同效应的方式,为森林的可持续利用提供动态激励,同时降低合规和管理成本。这是一种满足法律治外法权限制的机制,同时又允许各国在其边界之外采取行动。该机制包括木材进口国对木材可持续性的默认假设所征收的税收,以及对可持续性高于假设的证据所提供的税收折扣。这种证明是通过在木材进口时向海关当局出示可持续性证书来建立的。该Feebate机制减少了海外林业认证和税收文献中的一系列标准问题,例如门槛成本问题、搭便车问题和具有竞争可持续性证书的市场中的消费者认可度问题,以及在数据不可获得的部门中计算有效庇古税率的问题。我们表明,以价格为基础的工具与证书相结合,比单独使用每一种工具更能导致木材生产的可持续性,而不会以治外法权的方式侵犯南方国家的主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信