Quality of Education and Supervisory Practices in Pakistani Schools

M. Behlol, Qaisra Parveen
{"title":"Quality of Education and Supervisory Practices in Pakistani Schools","authors":"M. Behlol, Qaisra Parveen","doi":"10.24203/AJEEL.V1I5.482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The major research questions of the study were to explore the nature of supervisory practices at Primary and Secondary educational institutions of Pakistan and their impacts on the quality of education. The population of the study was the teachers, heads of institutions and district level supervisors.  Multistage random sampling technique was applied to select the participants of the study.  .It is a descriptive study and the variables were studied in natural condition. The   method of qualitative research was applied to collect the data of the study. The researcher constructed semi structured interview for teachers and district level supervisors that was validated by the experts. The main conclusions of the study are that the supervisors follow inspectoral mode to find out the faults of teachers to threaten and humiliate them. They do not facilitate and help them in solving the problems that they may face in the classroom. They do not observe the teaching learning process in the classroom and guide the teachers to apply innovative approaches and techniques to improve their teaching. To them, supervision is fault finding approach instead of sharing, guiding, helping and facilitating the teachers. Questioning and innovative approaches on the part of teachers are taken as violation of discipline. There is an urgent need to shift from inspectoral to clinical model of supervision to improve the teaching learning process and consequently the quality of education.","PeriodicalId":325097,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24203/AJEEL.V1I5.482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The major research questions of the study were to explore the nature of supervisory practices at Primary and Secondary educational institutions of Pakistan and their impacts on the quality of education. The population of the study was the teachers, heads of institutions and district level supervisors.  Multistage random sampling technique was applied to select the participants of the study.  .It is a descriptive study and the variables were studied in natural condition. The   method of qualitative research was applied to collect the data of the study. The researcher constructed semi structured interview for teachers and district level supervisors that was validated by the experts. The main conclusions of the study are that the supervisors follow inspectoral mode to find out the faults of teachers to threaten and humiliate them. They do not facilitate and help them in solving the problems that they may face in the classroom. They do not observe the teaching learning process in the classroom and guide the teachers to apply innovative approaches and techniques to improve their teaching. To them, supervision is fault finding approach instead of sharing, guiding, helping and facilitating the teachers. Questioning and innovative approaches on the part of teachers are taken as violation of discipline. There is an urgent need to shift from inspectoral to clinical model of supervision to improve the teaching learning process and consequently the quality of education.
巴基斯坦学校的教育质量和监督实践
本研究的主要研究问题是探讨巴基斯坦中小学教育机构监督实践的性质及其对教育质量的影响。研究对象为教师、院校负责人和区级主管。本研究采用多阶段随机抽样技术选择研究对象,为描述性研究,研究变量均在自然条件下进行。本研究采用定性研究的方法收集资料。研究者对教师和区级主管进行了半结构化访谈,并得到了专家的验证。本研究的主要结论是:督导人员采用检查模式,发现教师的缺点,对教师进行威胁和羞辱。他们不能促进和帮助他们解决在课堂上可能面临的问题。他们没有在课堂上观察教学过程,也没有指导教师运用创新的方法和技术来改进教学。对他们来说,监督是一种吹毛求疵的方式,而不是分享、指导、帮助和促进教师。教师的质疑和创新行为被视为违纪行为。为改善教学过程,提高教学质量,迫切需要从监督模式向临床模式转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信