DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF SAUDI ARABIA’S BANKING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

{"title":"DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF SAUDI ARABIA’S BANKING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY","authors":"","doi":"10.46281/ijibfr.v11i1.2028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Banks' digital transformation has become a growing and competitive research area in the last decade. This study aims to compare the digital transformation of the Saudi banking sector with that of developed and emerging Islamic countries by examining progress, digital solutions to banking services provided, and regulatory frameworks. To this end, a systematic review was conducted, analyzing 44 primary documents and seven websites collected through a 5-step process: scoping, planning, searching, selection, and eligibility. Next, a comparative analysis of these documents was conducted, analyzing the similarities and differences of the digital transformation processes addressed by Saudi Arabia, the U.S., the United Kingdom, and Malaysia. The findings revealed that Saudi Arabia and Malaysia have banking sectors of similar size, smaller than those of the U.S. and the U.K., although all of these sectors are of significant importance in the economies of their respective countries, as measured by their share in GDP. All countries have adopted similar digital technologies and offer very similar banking services. Concerning its regulatory frameworks, the U.K.'s sandbox approach is the most effective and inspiring. At the same time, the U.S. needs to catch up due to its regulatory complexities and differences in approach between federal and state jurisdictions. For their part, Saudi Arabia and Malaysia have developed their regulatory frameworks with approaches inspired by the U.K. model, although both differ in the degree of Sharia compliance.","PeriodicalId":289590,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46281/ijibfr.v11i1.2028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Banks' digital transformation has become a growing and competitive research area in the last decade. This study aims to compare the digital transformation of the Saudi banking sector with that of developed and emerging Islamic countries by examining progress, digital solutions to banking services provided, and regulatory frameworks. To this end, a systematic review was conducted, analyzing 44 primary documents and seven websites collected through a 5-step process: scoping, planning, searching, selection, and eligibility. Next, a comparative analysis of these documents was conducted, analyzing the similarities and differences of the digital transformation processes addressed by Saudi Arabia, the U.S., the United Kingdom, and Malaysia. The findings revealed that Saudi Arabia and Malaysia have banking sectors of similar size, smaller than those of the U.S. and the U.K., although all of these sectors are of significant importance in the economies of their respective countries, as measured by their share in GDP. All countries have adopted similar digital technologies and offer very similar banking services. Concerning its regulatory frameworks, the U.K.'s sandbox approach is the most effective and inspiring. At the same time, the U.S. needs to catch up due to its regulatory complexities and differences in approach between federal and state jurisdictions. For their part, Saudi Arabia and Malaysia have developed their regulatory frameworks with approaches inspired by the U.K. model, although both differ in the degree of Sharia compliance.
沙特阿拉伯银行业的数字化转型:比较研究
在过去的十年中,银行的数字化转型已经成为一个不断发展和竞争激烈的研究领域。本研究旨在通过研究进展、提供的银行服务的数字化解决方案和监管框架,将沙特银行业的数字化转型与发达国家和新兴伊斯兰国家的数字化转型进行比较。为此,我们进行了系统的评价,分析了通过5个步骤收集的44份主要文件和7个网站:范围、计划、搜索、选择和资格。接下来,对这些文件进行了比较分析,分析了沙特阿拉伯、美国、英国和马来西亚在数字化转型过程中的异同。调查结果显示,沙特阿拉伯和马来西亚的银行业规模相似,规模小于美国和英国,尽管以占GDP的比重衡量,这些行业在各自国家的经济中都占有重要地位。所有国家都采用了类似的数字技术,并提供非常相似的银行服务。就其监管框架而言,英国他的沙盒方法是最有效和最鼓舞人心的。与此同时,由于监管的复杂性以及联邦和各州司法管辖区之间的做法差异,美国需要迎头赶上。就沙特阿拉伯和马来西亚而言,他们的监管框架受到了英国模式的启发,尽管两国在遵守伊斯兰教法的程度上有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书