Open access initiative and its effect on the quality of scholarly communication

E.A.O. Agyei, C. Pullen
{"title":"Open access initiative and its effect on the quality of scholarly communication","authors":"E.A.O. Agyei, C. Pullen","doi":"10.4314/GLJ.V21I1-2.69495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of how the Open Access (OA) Initiative affects the quality of scholarly literature. Content analysis was the methodology used to analyze information resources. Mostly peer-reviewed articles published between the years 2000-2006 that discuss the Open Access (OA) Movement and its effects on the quality of scholarly communication were used. The peer-review process was critically analyzed for the importance it plays in scholarly literature. The findings indicate that the present business model of the OA Initiative gives cause to doubt the quality of research articles published in the medium (OA). As much as advocates of the OA Movement do not approve of this opinion, they acknowledge this as a major challenge facing the movement.","PeriodicalId":399599,"journal":{"name":"Ghana Library Journal","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghana Library Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/GLJ.V21I1-2.69495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of how the Open Access (OA) Initiative affects the quality of scholarly literature. Content analysis was the methodology used to analyze information resources. Mostly peer-reviewed articles published between the years 2000-2006 that discuss the Open Access (OA) Movement and its effects on the quality of scholarly communication were used. The peer-review process was critically analyzed for the importance it plays in scholarly literature. The findings indicate that the present business model of the OA Initiative gives cause to doubt the quality of research articles published in the medium (OA). As much as advocates of the OA Movement do not approve of this opinion, they acknowledge this as a major challenge facing the movement.
开放获取倡议及其对学术传播质量的影响
本文的目的是概述开放获取(OA)计划如何影响学术文献的质量。内容分析法是用来分析信息资源的方法。大多数同行评议的文章发表于2000-2006年间,讨论开放获取(OA)运动及其对学术交流质量的影响。同行评议过程因其在学术文献中的重要性而被批判性地分析。研究结果表明,OA计划目前的商业模式使人们对发表在OA媒体上的研究文章的质量产生怀疑。尽管OA运动的倡导者不同意这种观点,但他们承认这是该运动面临的主要挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信