The Comparison of Split-Flow Algorithms in Network Traffic Classification: Sequential Mode vs. Parallel Model

Rui Yang
{"title":"The Comparison of Split-Flow Algorithms in Network Traffic Classification: Sequential Mode vs. Parallel Model","authors":"Rui Yang","doi":"10.1109/ITA.2013.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, with the popularity of the network, the assistance of the network seem to be much more important. It requests much higher performance to the network as well as great pressure to available bandwidth. And P2P (Peer-to-Peer) network accelerates the exhaustion of the rest bandwidth. Therefore, different network traffic classification algorithms turn up one after another, such as machine learning, data mining, pattern recognition etc. No matter which algorithms are adopted, one technique detail cannot be neglected, classifying the packets into flows (flow-split) process. This process may achieve better time complexity and space complexity in short time interval traffic traces. But with the extension of the traffic traces scale, the split-flow process appears time-consuming and effort-consuming. In addition, split-flow plays irreplaceable role in the construction of the classification algorithms and the classification. In this paper, we propose parallel flow-split model and estimate the efficiency with the sequential model to derive our experimental results.","PeriodicalId":285687,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Conference on Information Technology and Applications","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Conference on Information Technology and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITA.2013.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In recent years, with the popularity of the network, the assistance of the network seem to be much more important. It requests much higher performance to the network as well as great pressure to available bandwidth. And P2P (Peer-to-Peer) network accelerates the exhaustion of the rest bandwidth. Therefore, different network traffic classification algorithms turn up one after another, such as machine learning, data mining, pattern recognition etc. No matter which algorithms are adopted, one technique detail cannot be neglected, classifying the packets into flows (flow-split) process. This process may achieve better time complexity and space complexity in short time interval traffic traces. But with the extension of the traffic traces scale, the split-flow process appears time-consuming and effort-consuming. In addition, split-flow plays irreplaceable role in the construction of the classification algorithms and the classification. In this paper, we propose parallel flow-split model and estimate the efficiency with the sequential model to derive our experimental results.
网络流量分类中分流算法的比较:顺序模式与并行模式
近年来,随着网络的普及,网络的辅助显得更加重要。它对网络的性能提出了更高的要求,同时也给可用带宽带来了巨大的压力。P2P (Peer-to-Peer)网络加速了剩余带宽的耗尽。因此,不同的网络流量分类算法层出不穷,如机器学习、数据挖掘、模式识别等。无论采用哪种算法,都不能忽视一个技术细节,即将数据包划分为流(flow-split)过程。该方法可以在短时间间隔的流量轨迹中获得较好的时间复杂度和空间复杂度。但随着流量迹线规模的扩大,分流过程显得费时费力。此外,分裂流在分类算法的构建和分类中具有不可替代的作用。在本文中,我们提出了并行流分割模型,并用序列模型估计效率,从而得出我们的实验结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信