Is There a Change? Distance Education Studies in COVID-19 Pandemic

Gürhan Gürhan, Serkan Cankaya
{"title":"Is There a Change? Distance Education Studies in COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Gürhan Gürhan, Serkan Cankaya","doi":"10.24203/ajeel.v8i3.6458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the Coronavirus epidemic in China at the end of 2019 and in the rest of the World in the first quarter of 2020, all educational institutions started to give distance education partially or completely. Institutions were not ready for such a process, and they failed to the necessary preparations. That's why these applications are called emergency distance education. As a result, for the evaluation of distance education practices during the pandemic period, a number of studies have been published and continue to be conducted. Evaluation of these publications with content analysis will be very important in analyzing this period in the future. In this respect, the purpose of this study was to perform the content analysis of the articles related to distance education practices in the pandemic period. As a result of the search done using the Scopus database, a total of 180 articles were examined within the scope of the present study. The articles were examined in terms of country, number of times of citation, keywords, participants, data collection tools, variables / research interests, research designs and methods. Consequently, it was seen that the publications were mostly done in the USA; Opinion, Reflection and Review studies were conducted and cited most; that mostly the keywords of learning, online, education and covid-19 were used; that the participants were mostly undergraduate students; that the most frequent data collection tool was questionnaire; and that the most frequent dependent variables were engagement, readiness, perception and self-efficacy. The findings obtained were discussed in line with the related literature, and various suggestions were put forward.","PeriodicalId":325097,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24203/ajeel.v8i3.6458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

With the Coronavirus epidemic in China at the end of 2019 and in the rest of the World in the first quarter of 2020, all educational institutions started to give distance education partially or completely. Institutions were not ready for such a process, and they failed to the necessary preparations. That's why these applications are called emergency distance education. As a result, for the evaluation of distance education practices during the pandemic period, a number of studies have been published and continue to be conducted. Evaluation of these publications with content analysis will be very important in analyzing this period in the future. In this respect, the purpose of this study was to perform the content analysis of the articles related to distance education practices in the pandemic period. As a result of the search done using the Scopus database, a total of 180 articles were examined within the scope of the present study. The articles were examined in terms of country, number of times of citation, keywords, participants, data collection tools, variables / research interests, research designs and methods. Consequently, it was seen that the publications were mostly done in the USA; Opinion, Reflection and Review studies were conducted and cited most; that mostly the keywords of learning, online, education and covid-19 were used; that the participants were mostly undergraduate students; that the most frequent data collection tool was questionnaire; and that the most frequent dependent variables were engagement, readiness, perception and self-efficacy. The findings obtained were discussed in line with the related literature, and various suggestions were put forward.
有变化吗?COVID-19大流行中的远程教育研究
随着2019年底中国和2020年第一季度全球新冠肺炎疫情的爆发,所有教育机构都开始部分或全部开展远程教育。各机构没有为这一进程做好准备,也没有做好必要的准备。这就是为什么这些应用程序被称为紧急远程教育。因此,为了评价大流行期间的远程教育做法,已经发表了一些研究报告,并将继续进行这些研究。对这些出版物进行内容分析评价将是今后对这一时期进行分析的重要内容。在这方面,本研究的目的是对大流行时期远程教育实践相关文章进行内容分析。由于使用Scopus数据库进行了搜索,在本研究范围内共检查了180篇文章。文章的审查标准包括国家、被引次数、关键词、参与者、数据收集工具、变量/研究兴趣、研究设计和方法。因此,可以看到这些出版物大多是在美国完成的;进行的意见、反思和审查研究和引用最多;“学习”、“在线”、“教育”、“新冠肺炎”等关键词使用最多;参与者大多是本科生;最常用的数据收集工具是问卷调查;最常见的因变量是投入,准备,感知和自我效能。结合相关文献对所得结果进行了讨论,并提出了各种建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信