The Status and Role of Law in Bio-politics: Bio-politics and law seen through the 「SERIOUS ACCIDENTS PUNISHMENT ACT」

Bong Su Kim
{"title":"The Status and Role of Law in Bio-politics: Bio-politics and law seen through the 「SERIOUS ACCIDENTS PUNISHMENT ACT」","authors":"Bong Su Kim","doi":"10.38133/cnulawreview.2023.43.1.99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At some point, the victim’s name comes before the bill. These ‘naming bills’ honor ‘deaths that became law’. The 「SERIOUS ACCIDENTS PUNISHMENT ACT」 to be covered in this article is one of the “Acts as a Monument” which was called the “Late Kim Yong-kyun Act.” Bio-politics emerges in the philosophical context of postmodernity to overcome Western modernity. In other words, it is the “Bio-politics” that focuses on overcoming modern understanding of humans (humanism, reason, rationality, etc.) and human life and life that are at stake in the excess of capitalism and science and technology. And the law is related to Bio-politics in that it is a social condition that is partially involved in the discussion of life politics of Foucault, Agamben, and Hart/Negri. As the name of the law says, the Serious Disaster Punishment Act is a law specially enacted for the punishment of disaster managers. And the legitimacy of the punishment is sought from “prevention of serious disasters” and “protection of life and body.” From this point, the moment when “protection of life and body” is put to the forefront as the justification for punishment, the law for punishment is linked to “Bio-politics” and “Bio-power” intervenes in the process. The 「SERIOUS ACCIDENTS PUNISHMENT ACT」 shows the appearance of “living” Bio-power by expanding the scope of protection to “workers and citizens,” but also creates exceptions or blind spots by reducing/limiting the scope and scope of application through the norm framework of “principle-exception.” However, the fact that the 「SERIOUS ACCIDENTS PUNISHMENT ACT」 was enacted to enable punishment of managers and corporations, which was previously impossible, may indicate that “multiple” resistance to life power has already begun. I think that the current time, one year after the enforcement of the law, is a time when the boundaries between life and death have not yet been clearly drawn. Therefore, now is the time to redraw the boundaries of the law in the direction of expanding the realm of life a little more through multiple continuous attention and raising questions, not as “Joe” or “Homo Soccer,” but as “Bios.”","PeriodicalId":288398,"journal":{"name":"Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National University","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38133/cnulawreview.2023.43.1.99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At some point, the victim’s name comes before the bill. These ‘naming bills’ honor ‘deaths that became law’. The 「SERIOUS ACCIDENTS PUNISHMENT ACT」 to be covered in this article is one of the “Acts as a Monument” which was called the “Late Kim Yong-kyun Act.” Bio-politics emerges in the philosophical context of postmodernity to overcome Western modernity. In other words, it is the “Bio-politics” that focuses on overcoming modern understanding of humans (humanism, reason, rationality, etc.) and human life and life that are at stake in the excess of capitalism and science and technology. And the law is related to Bio-politics in that it is a social condition that is partially involved in the discussion of life politics of Foucault, Agamben, and Hart/Negri. As the name of the law says, the Serious Disaster Punishment Act is a law specially enacted for the punishment of disaster managers. And the legitimacy of the punishment is sought from “prevention of serious disasters” and “protection of life and body.” From this point, the moment when “protection of life and body” is put to the forefront as the justification for punishment, the law for punishment is linked to “Bio-politics” and “Bio-power” intervenes in the process. The 「SERIOUS ACCIDENTS PUNISHMENT ACT」 shows the appearance of “living” Bio-power by expanding the scope of protection to “workers and citizens,” but also creates exceptions or blind spots by reducing/limiting the scope and scope of application through the norm framework of “principle-exception.” However, the fact that the 「SERIOUS ACCIDENTS PUNISHMENT ACT」 was enacted to enable punishment of managers and corporations, which was previously impossible, may indicate that “multiple” resistance to life power has already begun. I think that the current time, one year after the enforcement of the law, is a time when the boundaries between life and death have not yet been clearly drawn. Therefore, now is the time to redraw the boundaries of the law in the direction of expanding the realm of life a little more through multiple continuous attention and raising questions, not as “Joe” or “Homo Soccer,” but as “Bios.”
法律在生命政治中的地位与作用——从《重大事故处罚法》看生命政治与法律
在某些时候,受害者的名字出现在账单之前。这些“命名法案”是为了纪念“成为法律的死亡”。本文所涉及的“重大事故处罚法”是被称为“已故金容均法”的“纪念法”之一。生命政治是在后现代性哲学语境中为克服西方现代性而产生的。换句话说,“生命政治”的重点是克服现代对人类的理解(人文主义、理性、理性等),以及在资本主义和科学技术的过剩中受到威胁的人的生命和生命。法律与生命政治有关,因为它是一种社会条件,在福柯、阿甘本和哈特/内格里对生命政治的讨论中有部分涉及。《重大灾害处罚法》顾名思义,是专门为惩罚灾害管理者而制定的法律。从“防止重大灾害”和“保护生命和身体”两个方面寻求刑罚的正当性。从这一点来看,当“保护生命和身体”作为惩罚的理由被摆在首位的时候,惩罚的法律就与“生物政治”联系在一起,“生物权力”介入了这一过程。《重大事故处罚法》虽然将保护范围扩大到“劳动者和市民”,表现出“活的”生物能源的面貌,但通过“原则-例外”的规范框架,缩小或限制了适用范围和范围,造成了例外或盲区。然而,《重大事故处罚法》的制定,使得以往不可能对管理者和企业进行处罚成为可能,这或许表明,对生命权力的“多重”抵抗已经开始。我认为,目前,在法律实施一年后,是一个生与死之间的界限尚未明确划定的时期。因此,现在是时候重新划定法律的界限,通过多次持续的关注和提出问题,而不是作为“Joe”或“Homo Soccer”,而是作为“Bios”,进一步扩大生命的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信